诠释与致用:王安石、阮元经学思想比较研究

Interpretation and Practice:A Comparative Study on Wang Anshi and Ruan Yuan Confucian Classics

同样是学优之志仕,王安石和阮元的经学思想异中有同。王安石之经学秉承原始儒家致用之思想而重为政之实践,阮元之经学则承袭汉儒考据之行风而偏训诂之诠释。王安石之"致用的经学"里,包含着阮元式的"经学的诠释",亦可谓"经学解释学"。同样的,阮元之"诠释的经学"里,也包含着王安石式的"经学的致用",可名曰"经学实践论"。王安石和阮元的经学思想都给他们所处的时代作出了积极的贡献。他们"通经致用"的思想给当今中国的改革提供了有益的养分。

As excellent scholars and managements , there is similarity in all,terence and clltterence in similarity Wang Anshi and Ruan Yuan Confucian classics. Wang Anshi＇s multiple practical Confucianism, Ruan Yuan of classics interpretation is more important. A tool of Wang Anshi in the ＂ Confucian classics＂ contain Ruan Yuan interpretation of Confucian classics, but there is a ＂ hermeneutic classics＂. Similarly, Ruan Yuan ＂interpretation of classics＂ contains the ＂classics of the practical＂ of Wang Anshi type, i.e. ＂practical Confucianism＂. Wang Anshi and Ruan Yuan Confucian classics to their age have made a positive contribution. Today＇s Chinese reform also can get beneficial nutrients from it.