期刊文献+

中国人集体主义的南北方差异及其文化动力 被引量:33

The difference of collectivism between north and south China and its cultural dynamics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国存在着集体主义的地区差异,但学者对其内在动力机制尚未达成共识。我们认为儒家文化影响力的大小不容忽视,受儒家文化影响越深的区域集体主义倾向越强。研究运用"亲亲性(loyalty/nepotism)"的内隐文化任务对来自27个省份的745名被试进行调查,结果发现南方人对朋友更优待,内外群体的心理界限更明显,集体主义倾向更强。并探讨以儒家文化为代表的中原文化中心南迁对这一差异形成的影响及其未来研究方向。 It has been found that collectivism differs across provinces within China. Nevertheless there's still no consensus on its underlying mechanism. We propose that the strength of Confucianism is the main reason behind differences in collectivism across China i.e. central Confucian places tend to be more collectivistic than other places. We tested 745 Han Chinese participants from 27 provinces and found that southerners tend to be more collectivistic compared to northerners on loyalty/nepotism task. These results stand in support of the strength of Confucianism hypothesis arguing that south China had replaced north China as the center of Confucianism since Song dynasty due to the relocation of Central-Plains culture from north China to south China.
作者 马欣然 任孝鹏 徐江 MA Xinran REN Xiaopeng XU Jiang(Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期1551-1555,共5页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 中国科学院科技服务网络计划(STS计划)(KFJ-EW-STS-088) 科技基础性工作专项资助项目(2009FY11 0100) 中国科学院心理所应急项目"中国人集体主义的心理地图"资助项目(Y4CX157009)
关键词 集体主义 南北方 亲亲性 儒家文化影响力 文化中心迁移 collectivism north and south China loyalty/nepotism task strength of Confucianism hypothesis Central-Plains culture
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1葛剑雄.(2013).纺一与分裂:中国历史的启示(p.10和113,PP,123—129).北京:商务印书馆.
  • 2苏红,任孝鹏.个体主义的地区差异和代际变迁[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(6):1006-1015. 被引量:12
  • 3许倬云.(2006).万古江洞:中国历史文化的转折和开展(PP.58—61,PP.96—100,PP.122—124,PP.150—153,PP.172~176,PP.240-244).上海:上海文艺出版社.
  • 4许倬博云.(2015).说中国:一个不断变化的复杂共同体(pp.95—103,PP.122—125,PP.146—147,PP.210—215).桂林:广西师范大学出版社.
  • 5张剑,柳小妮,谭忠厚,陈全功.基于GIS的中国南北地理气候分界带模拟[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2012,48(3):28-33. 被引量:27
  • 6Georgas, J., & Berry, J. W. (1995). An ecocultural taxonomy for cross-cultural psychology. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(2), 121-157.
  • 7Ho, P. T. (1962). The ladder of success in imperial China." Aspects of social mobility, 1368-1911. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • 8Morling, B., & Lamoreaux, M. (2008). Measuring culture outside the head: A meta-analysis of individualism- collectivism in cultural products. PersonaRty and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 199-221.
  • 9Paciotti, B., Hadley, C., Holmes, C., & Mulder, M. (2005). Grass-roots justice in Tanzania: Cultural evolution and game theory help to explain how a history of cooperation influences the success of social organizations. American Scientist 0~(1~ ~R-~.
  • 10Talhelm, T., Zhang, X., Oishi, S., Shimin, C., Duan, D., Lan, X., & Kitayama, S. (2014). Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science, 344, 603-608.

二级参考文献68

共引文献37

同被引文献363

引证文献33

二级引证文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部