期刊文献+

亲社会名声与亲社会行为 被引量:10

Prosocial reputation and prosocial behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 亲社会名声是行动者获得的亲社会特质声誉,它有益于行动者的社会适应。行动者首先通过亲社会行为建立亲社会名声,亲社会名声又通过间接互惠和同伴选择过程对行动者产生外在激励作用,通过自我概念对行动者产生内在激励作用,进而促进其亲社会行为。行动者的贫富水平、亲社会行为的公开性、自我获益和宣传方式影响其亲社会名声的获得。未来研究应关注亲社会行为与亲社会名声之间的相互促进过程,探索行动者亲社会行为的代价与获益如何交互影响其亲社会名声;行动者的社会阶层如何通过对人们预期的影响而调节行动者的亲社会名声;亲社会名声促进亲社会行为的内在机制与边界条件。 Prosocial reputation is the evaluation that prosocial actors acquired regarding his/her prosocial traits. Actors establish prosocial reputation through prosocial behavior. Then prosocial reputation could generate extrinsic prosocial motivation of actors through indirect reciprocity and partner choosing process, and intrinsic prosocial motivation through self-concept. Thus, it could promote actors' prosocial behavior. The influencing factors of prosocial reputation include actors' resources at hand, publicity of prosocial behavior, personal benefits, and ways of advertising. Future research should focus on the mutual promotion between prosocial behavior and prosocial reputation, by exploring the interaction effect of the costs and the benefits of actors' prosocial behavior on prosocial reputation, the moderate effect of actors' social class(by affecting people's expectation) on the relationship between prosocial behavior and prosocial reputation, as well as the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions of how prosocial reputation promotes actors' prosocial behavior.
作者 苑明亮 张梦圆 寇彧 YUAN Mingliang ZHANG Mengyuan KOU Yu(Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期1655-1662,共8页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(10JJD XLX002) 北京市教育委员会项目(PXM2014_0142 02_07_000067) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金和积极心理学研究基金的资助
关键词 亲社会名声 亲社会行为 获益 间接互惠 同伴选择 prosocial reputation prosocial behavior benefits indirect reciprocity partner choice
  • 相关文献

参考文献63

  • 1寇或,张庆鹏.(2005).青少年亲社会行为的概念表征研究.社会学研究.5,170-187.
  • 2刘国芳,辛自强.间接互惠中的声誉机制:印象、名声、标签及其传递[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(2):233-242. 被引量:28
  • 3Alexander, R. D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter Publishers.
  • 4Ames, D. R., Flynn, F. J., & Weber, E. U. (2004). It's the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 461-474.
  • 5Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. The American Economic Review, 99(1), 544-555.
  • 6Barasch, A., Levine, E. E., Berman, J. Z., & Small, D. A. (2014). Selfish or selfless? On the signal value of emotion in altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 393-413.
  • 7Barbareschi, G., Sanderman, R., Kempen, G. I. J. M., & Ranchor, A. V. (2008). The mediating role of perceived control on the relationship between socioeconomic status and functional changes in older patients with coronary heart disease. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(6), P353-P361.
  • 8Barclay, P. (2004). Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the "tragedy of the commons". Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(4), 209-220.
  • 9Barclay, P., & Willer, R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1610), 749-753.
  • 10Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2(3), 412-414.

二级参考文献46

  • 1Leimar, O., & Hammerstein, E (2001). Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.B. Biological Sciences, 268(1468), 745-753.
  • 2Mesoudi, A., & O-Brien, M. J. (2008). The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile point technology II: An agent-based computer simulation. American Antiquity, 73(4), 627-644.
  • 3Milinski, M., Semmann, D., Bakker, T., & Krambeck, H. J. (2001). Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: Image scoring or standing strategy?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 268(1484), 2495-2501.
  • 4Milinski, M., & Wedekind, C. (1998). Working memory constrains human cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(23), 13755-13758.
  • 5Mohtashemi, M., & Mui, L. (2003). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by social information: The role of trust and reputation in evolution of altruism. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 223(4), 523-531.
  • 6Nakamaru, M., & Kawata, M. (2004). Evolution of rumours that discriminate lying defectors. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 6(2), 261-283.
  • 7Nowak, M. A., & Roch, S. (2007). Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1610), 605-610.
  • 8Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998a). The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 194(4), 561-574.
  • 9Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998b). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393(6685), 573-577.
  • 10Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437(7063), 1291-1298.

共引文献28

同被引文献117

引证文献10

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部