摘要
日本政府于2016年4月15日公布了一份有关钓鱼岛归属的最新委托调查报告。该报告首次出示了两份日本早期偷猎者井泽弥喜太的相关史料,以证明清政府在1893年并未对井泽等人前往钓鱼岛提出任何异议,据此来判定清政府当时并未将钓鱼岛视为中国的领土。然而,事实却恰恰相反,日本外务省有关井泽弥喜太的相关历史档案,1893年日本《九州日日新闻》的当事人访谈连载报道,特别是井泽弥喜太长女井泽真伎1972年1月8日留下的历史证言等,进一步证明钓鱼岛属于中国是不争的事实。
The Japanese government promulgated a report in regards with the Diaoyu Islands sovereignty on April 15, 2016. In the report, two documents about Izawa Yakita were added for the first time to support the claim that the Qing government raised no objection to the disembarkation of Izawa Yakita group to Diaoyu Islands, which is in turn interpreted as an evidence that the Qing government did not regard Diaoyu Islands as China's territory.However, it is showed in this article that the fact is to the contrary. We investigate three pieces of evidence:the historical archives about Izawa Yakita that published by Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan and the interview reports of the Kyushu daily newspaper, especially Izawa Yakita's daughter Izawa Maki's testimony on January 8th, 1972. All of these records provide further evidence for Chinese indisputable sovereignty over Diaoyu Islands.
出处
《东北亚论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期100-111,126,共12页
Northeast Asia Forum
基金
教育部人文社科专项项目(20145000168)
关键词
中日关系
钓鱼岛
井泽弥喜太
井泽真伎证言
日本外务省
九州日日新闻
Sino-Japan Relationship
Diaoyu Islands
Izawa Yakita
Izawa Maki Testimony
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan
Kyushu Daily Newspaper