摘要
金坛区长达圩在2015年汛期中损毁较严重,需要进行改造加固。圩堤后多为村庄、房屋,传统圩堤加固方案实施涉及动迁、征地等问题,实施难度较大。本研究对传统护岸与仿木排桩护岸在造价、施工方法、工期等方面进行了比较,相对于传统护岸,仿木排桩护岸具有造价省、施工方便、工期短、生态美观等方面的优势;仿木排桩护岸在长达圩的成功运用,可以在今后的河道整治及圩堤加固工程中进行大力推广。
Changda Dike in Jintan District is seriously damaged during floods in 2015 and requires rehabilitation as well as strengthening.There are mostly village houses after dikes.Traditional embankment reinforcement scheme relates to relocation,land acquisition and other issues,which is difficult to implement.Traditional dikes and imitative wood pile dikes are compared in aspects of building cost,construction method,and construction period in this paper.Comparing to their traditional dikes,imitative wood pile dikes has the advantage of less building cost,easy to construct,short construction period,ecological aesthetic,etc.The successful application of imitative wood pile dikes could be propagated in river regulation and dikes reinforcement projects in future.
出处
《江苏水利》
2016年第9期16-19,共4页
Jiangsu Water Resources
关键词
圩堤加固
仿木排桩护岸
造价
dike reinforcement
imitative wood pile embankment
cost