期刊文献+

西比奥克建模系统理论与塔尔图学派的渊源

The Relationship between Sebeok's Modeling Systems Theory and the Tartu School
原文传递
导出
摘要 托马斯·西比奥克是当代符号学发展史上的关键人物,其符号学思想的核心就是建模系统理论,围绕作为"意义的形式"的模型及其构建方式而展开。西比奥克的建模系统理论主要是受到塔尔图学派的洛特曼和伊万诺夫的影响,但它与塔尔图学派的模拟系统概念从一开始就有着本质的不同。要想透彻理解这个看似带有形式主义色彩的关键符号学理论,就必须要认识到西比奥克的建模系统观实际上经历了两个不同时期,尤其需要注意该理论前期阶段与塔尔图学派的渊源,因为这奠定了整个建模系统理论后期发展的基本路径。 Thomas Sebeok was a key figure in the history of contemporary semiotics. At the very core of his semiotic thought is Modeling Systems Theory, which unfolds around models as "forms of meaning" and the ways of their construction. Sebeok' s Modeling Systems Theory was mainly under the influence of Lotman and Ivanov, but it was different than the Tartu conception of modeling systems from the very beginning. For a thorough understanding of this key semiotic theory seemingly tinted with Russian Formalism, one must realize that Sebeok' s view of modeling actually underwent two different phases, and particularly needs to notice the relationship between the former period and the Tartu School, as this relationship shaped the basic route of the development of the whole theory in its latter period.
作者 余红兵
出处 《俄罗斯文艺》 CSSCI 2016年第4期118-123,共6页 Russian Literature & Arts
基金 江苏省社会科学基金青年项目"西比奥克总体符号学视阈下的符号传播与认知机制研究"[项目编号:15TQC004] 中国博士后科学基金资助项目[资助等级:一等 资助编号:2015M580444 "江苏高校优势学科建设工程二期项目"[项目批号:20140901]的阶段性成果
关键词 西比奥克 洛特曼 塔尔图学派 建模系统理论 模型 Sebeok Lotman Tartu School Modeling Systems Theory Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Sebeok, Thomas & Danesi, Marcel. The Forms of Meaning. Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotic Analysis [M]. Berlin & New York. Mouton de Gruyter, 2000.
  • 2Sebeok, Thomas. Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs [M]. Lanham. University Press of America, Inc., 1976.
  • 3Sebeok, Thomas. Semiotics. A survey of the State of the Art [A]// Current Trends in Linguistics 12 [C], Ed. Sebeok, Thomas. Hague. Mouton, 1974.
  • 4Sebeok, Thomas. Signs. An Introduction to Semiotics [M]. Toronto. University of Toronto Press, 2001.
  • 5康澄.洛特曼语言观的嬗变及其意义[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2007,30(3):18-22. 被引量:10
  • 6张杰,康澄.叙事文本的“间离”:陌生化与生活化之间——析洛特曼对《叶甫盖尼·奥涅金》的研究[J].外国文学研究,2003,25(6):58-62. 被引量:5
  • 7Lucid, Daniel. (Ed.). Semiotics. An Anthology [C], Baltimore. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.
  • 8赵爱国.20世纪俄罗斯语言学遗产[M].北京大学出版社,2012.
  • 9N6th, Winfried. Handbook of Semiotics [M]. Bloomington and Indianapolis. Indiana University Press, 1995.
  • 10Sebeok, Thomas. Language. How Primary a Modeling System? [A]// Semiotics 1987 [C], Ed. Deely, John. Lanham, MD. University Press of America, 1988.

二级参考文献16

  • 1康澄.文本——洛特曼文化符号学的核心概念[J].当代外国文学,2005,26(4):41-49. 被引量:73
  • 2Лотман Ю.М.Семиосфера[M].Санкт-Петербург:Искусство-СПБ,2000.
  • 3Лотман Ю.М.Семиотика культуры в тартуско-московской семиотической школе[C] //Ю.М.Лотман.История и типология русской культуры.Cанкт-Петербург:Искусство-СПБ,2002:5-20.
  • 4Лотман Ю.М.Воспитание души[M].Санкт-Петербург:Искусство-СПБ,2003.
  • 5Мечковская Н.Б.Семиотика[M].Москва:ACADEMA,2004.
  • 6Пайман А.Юрий Лотман-Вточке поворота[J].Slavica Tergestina,1996,(4):21.
  • 7Тороп П.Тартуская школа как школа[C] //Е.В.Пермяков.Лотмановский сборник.Т.1.Москва:ИЦ-Гарант,1995:223-239.
  • 8Portis-Winner,Irene & Thomas G.Winner.The semiotics of cultural texts[J].Semiotica,1976,18,(2):101-156.
  • 9Лотман Ю.М.Избранные статьи в трех томах[M].Т.1.Таллин:Александра,1992.
  • 10Лотман Ю.М.Об искусстве[M].Санкт-Петербург:Искусство-СПБ,1998.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部