摘要
2015年末,我国华北地区突发重度雾霾污染事件,《新京报》和澎湃新闻对此均作了及时的报道。在雾霾预警阶段,《新京报》对事件的反应比澎湃新闻更为迅速,且淡化了受众的风险意识;而澎湃新闻则在其相关报道中,勾画出一幅大的环境风险图景。在媒介问责与反思阶段,《新京报》建构了多方讨论公共议事框架,澎湃新闻则建构了国家舆论导向框架。在今后的相关报道中,媒体可以尝试拓宽其空间框架与时间框架,以更为全面客观地构建有关雾霾事件风险预期的全景框架。
At the end of 2015,the sudden severe fog and haze pollution events occur in North china,Beijing News and Surging News have been reported in a timely manner.In the phase of fog and haze warning,the Beijing News response to the incident more quickly than surging news,and dilute the audience's sense of risk;while the Surging News outline a large picture of environmental risks in its related reports.In the phase of media accountability and reflection,the Beijing News construct a multi public discussion framework,the Surging News then construct the framework of national public opinion.In the future related reports,the media can try to broaden the framework of its space and time frame,in order to build the panoramic framework more comprehensively and objectively related to risk expectations of haze events.
出处
《长江大学学报(社会科学版)》
2016年第9期86-88,共3页
Journal of Yangtze University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
安徽省高等学校人文社科研究重点项目(SK2016A0758)
关键词
框架建构
雾霾
报道
frame construction
haze
report