期刊文献+

腐败行为的政府内监管研究 被引量:3

Intra-governmental Supervision on Corruption in China's Mainland:A weakened mechanism of corruption governance
原文传递
导出
摘要 腐败行为政府内监管是指监察机关、预防腐败机关、公职人员主管机关、国家公务员管理机关及审计机关等依照行政法律规范来预防和治理公职人员腐败的行为。目前被公众知悉的腐败行为多属于政党治理和司法治理范畴,政府内监管因其内部行政行为的属性往往导致公开性不足,此外政府内监管还一定程度上存在监管主体局限性、监管事由不完备、行政自由裁量权过度、监管机制封闭等问题。应该明确腐败行为政府内监管的主体及其职责、完善监管的事由、深化监管的措施,以充分发挥监管实效。 Intra - governmental supervision on corruption is the set of actions within administrative regulations used to prevent and govern the government civil servants' corruption via administrative organs. Organs such as the supervision organ, corruption prevention organ, competent authority of civil servants organ, national civil servants organ, and auditing office all serve a function in corruption governance. Currently, most instances of corruption known by the public belong in the categories of party governance and judicial governance. However, unlike the two above - mentioned categories, intra - governmental supervision is still lacking openness because of internal administrative actions. Moreover, intra - governmental supervision also has imperfections such as the limitations of supervision subject, the incompleteness of supervision motives, the exorbitance of administrative discretion, and the closed - door nature of the supervision mechanism. Therefore, in order to maximize the effect of intra - governmental supervision on corruption, the subject and the mechanism should be clarified, the motives for its use should be rationalized, and the techniques for its implementation should be optimized.
出处 《中国行政管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第11期76-80,共5页 Chinese Public Administration
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金“网络时代腐败治理中的公众有序参与:表征、路径及实证”(编号:15YJC630183)
关键词 腐败行为 政府内监管 腐败治理体系 corruption, intra- governmental supervision on corruption, governance system on corruption
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1俞可平.善治与治理[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社.2000.
  • 2[英]克里斯托弗·胡德,等.监管政府:节俭、优质与廉政体制设置[M].陈伟,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2009.
  • 3[美]戴维·奥斯本.改革政府一企业精神如何改革着公营部门[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1996:7.
  • 4[美]伯纳德·施瓦茨 徐炳 译.行政法[M].北京:群众出版社,1986..
  • 5刘作翔.法治社会中的权力和权利定位[J].法学研究,1996,18(4):69-79. 被引量:79
  • 6[英]阿克顿.自由与权力[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001..
  • 7张千帆.政府公开的原则与例外——论美国信息自由制度[J].当代法学,2008,22(5):21-29. 被引量:29

二级参考文献29

  • 1Charles H. Koch, Jr. , Administrative Law and Practice (Vol.Ⅰ, 2nd Ed. ), St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co. , 1997.
  • 2Patricia Wald, FOIA: A Short Case Study in the Perils and Paybacks of Legislating Democratic Values, 33 Emory Law Journal 649 (1984).
  • 3Overview of the Privacy Act of 1974 [EB/OL]. http: //www. usdoj.gov/04foia, 2008 -3 -5.
  • 4Peter L. Strauss, Todd Rakoff, Roy A. Schotland, and Cynthia R. Farina, Gellhorn and Byse' s Administrative Law: Cases and Comments (9th Ed. ), Westbury, NY: Foundation Press, 1995.
  • 5Federal RecordsAct, 44U. S. C. A.§2901.
  • 6Armstrong v. Bush, 924 F. 2d 283 (D. C. Cir. ).
  • 7Armstrong v. Executive Office of President, 810 F. Supp. 335 (1993).
  • 8Kissinger v, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 445 U. S. 136.
  • 9Department of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U. S. 352.
  • 10Weissman v. CIA, 565 F. 2d 692 (D. C. Cir. ).

共引文献359

同被引文献63

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部