期刊文献+

航空武器装备试验风险指数评估方法研究

Research on Risk Index Assessment Method for Aviation Weapon Equipment Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对现有的航空武器装备试验风险评估中风险指数确定方法的单一性和不合理性,提出了一种将模糊层次分析法和贝叶斯网络推理相结合的评估试验风险指数的方法。采用模糊层次分析法实现了评估中风险后果因素的量化评估;同时,利用贝叶斯网络分析引起风险的因素与可能导致的后果,结合专家知识定义了推理规则下各因素的条件概率矩阵,进而建立了航空武器装备风险评估的贝叶斯网络推理模型以及相应评估方法。实例分析表明,该方法合理有效,可为航空武器装备试验风险评估提供参考。 Due to the simplicity and irrationality of risk index assessment method in existing aviation weapon e- quipment test, this paper introduces a risk index assessment method to combine fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process with Bayesian network. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is employed to achieve quantitative evaluation of risk consequences in assessment, and the Bayesian network is utilized to analysis the risk factors and the possible consequences. The conditional probability matrix of the reasoning rule is given based on expert knowledge, and then the model of Bayesian networks and relative evaluation methods are developed. The analysis results show that this method is rational and effective and can provide a reference for risk auioment test. evaluation of aviation weapon e-quipment test.
机构地区 甘肃酒泉
出处 《电光系统》 2016年第3期8-12,共5页 Electronic and Electro-optical Systems
关键词 航空武器装备系统 风险评估 模糊层次分析法 贝叶斯网络 Aviation Weapon Equipment System Risk Assessment Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Bayes-ian Networks
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献17

  • 1陈伟炯,沈康辰,王洁.计算机辅助海运安全管理系统技术研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2004,14(5):32-37. 被引量:2
  • 2于冬.基于BP神经网络的风险投资评估模型[J].科技管理研究,2005,25(9):206-208. 被引量:6
  • 3Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasaning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference.San Mateo, CA, Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.
  • 4Pearl J. On Evidence Reasoning in a Hierarchy of Hypotheses [ J ].Artificial Intelligence, 1986, 28: 9-15.
  • 5Heckerman D. A Bayesian Approach for Leandng Causal Networks[C].Proceedings of the 11th Conference of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, 1995. 285-295.
  • 6Kirillov V P. Constructive Stochastic Temporal Reasoning in Situation Assessment[J].IEEE. Trans. on System, Man and Cybemetics, 1994,21(7): 1099-1113.
  • 7Zacharias G, Miao A, Illgen C, et al. SAMPLE: Situation Awareness Model for Pilot in the Loop Evaluation[C]. Proceeding of the First Annual Symposium on Situation Awareness in the Tactical Air Environment, Patuxent River, MD(June), 1996.
  • 8Chen Weijiong. Structure of the Basic Elements of Safety Science[A]. In: Zeng Qingxuan, ed. Progress in Safety Science and Technology[C]: Vol.I. Beijing: Science Press, 1998:49~55.
  • 9Chen Weijiong. Research on Maritime Formal Safety Assessment(FSA) Methodology[A]. In:WANG Yajun, ed. Progress in Safety Science and Technology[C]: Vol.IV. Beijing: Science Press, 2004:2373~2378.
  • 10IACS.Formal Safety Assessment Bulk Carriers(Annex 5)[EB/OL].http://www.iacs.org.uk/fsa/wp5/main.htm,2001.

共引文献153

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部