期刊文献+

生育自由的保障与规制——美国与德国宪法对中国的启示 被引量:19

Protection and Regulation of Reproductive Freedom:Enlightening Significance of U.S.Constitution and German Basic Law for China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为当代西方宪法人权理论与实践机制的两大典型,美国联邦宪法与德国基本法在生育自由的保障与规制方面呈现出诸多共性与分殊:前者将生育自由纳入隐私权的保障范围,后者则以自我自决权涵盖生育自由的保障,但均以个人的"自治"与"自决"为基本内涵;在生育自由规制方面,尽管两国宪法对胎儿生命权的保护起点存在分歧,但均主张生命权优越于堕胎自由。这为我们反思当下中国生育制度提供了一个有意义的参照系。在国际通行的生育权观念早已为我国以缔结国际公约方式所肯认,人权保障、依法治国业已成为我国社会价值共识的背景下,重塑生育制度的基本价值立场,建构一个以生育自由保障为根本逻辑的生育制度规范体系,具有重要的实现意义。 As two typical mechanisms of contemporary western theory and practice of human rights, U. S. Constitution and German Basic Law have both commonalities and divergences in the protection and regulation of reproductive freedom. Specifically, reproductive freedom is subsumed into the protection of privacy in the U. S. Constitution; while it belongs to the right of self-determination in German Basic Law. Individual "autonomy" and "self-determination" serve as the foundation for both of them. Though they remain different regarding the starting point of the protection of right of life, they both propose that right of life is prior to right of abortion. Therefore,the above-mentioned contents provide a meaningful frame of reference for reflecting the present birth system in China. Furthermore, the internationally accepted concept of reproductive right has long been affirmed by our government by entering international covenants. In the meantime protection of human rights and rule of law have already became the consensus value of the whole society in China. Under such background,it has a great realistic significance for remodeling the basic value standpoint of birth system and constructing a normative system aimed at protecting the reproductive freedom in China.
作者 余军
出处 《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期110-117,共8页 Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
基金 国家"2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心研究成果 国家社会科学基金一般项目(12BFX041) 广东省人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(2012JDXM-0005)
关键词 生育自由 隐私权 自决权 人格权 reproductive freedom right of privacy right of self-determination right of personality
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1胡玉鸿.“人的尊严”思想的法律意蕴[J].江苏行政学院学报,2005(4):101-106. 被引量:12
  • 2侯宇.论人性尊严的宪法保障[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,2006,21(2):144-148. 被引量:16
  • 3陈驰.论宪法学的人学特色[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2006,33(6):18-23. 被引量:4
  • 4.《世界人权宣言》[M].,..
  • 5[日]芦部信喜.《宪法学I(宪法总论)》,有斐阁,1992年版,第46页以下.
  • 6蔡维音.“德国基本法第一条‘人性尊严’规定之探讨”,载(台湾)《宪政时代》,第十八卷第一期(1992年).
  • 7See International Covenant on Civile and Political Rights, or International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
  • 8[日]初宿正典.《宪法Ⅱ·基本权》,成文堂,2001年版,第126页.
  • 9[日]Jose Llompart.《人的尊严与国家权力》,成文堂,1990年版,第58页以下.
  • 10BverfGE 45,187,Urteil v.21.6.1977.

共引文献214

同被引文献242

引证文献19

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部