期刊文献+

体重指数与腰围预测徐州市居民罹患高血压、糖尿病风险的横断面研究 被引量:12

A cross sectional study on the predictive value of body mass index and waist circumference for the risk of hypertension and diabetes of the residents in Xuzhou City
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探究体重指数( BMI)、腰围预测高血压、糖尿病的最佳界值点及不同BMI、腰围状态下罹患疾病的风险。方法采用多阶段整群随机抽样的方法,对徐州市泉山区11个社区的2246名18岁及以上常住居民进行问卷调查和体格检查,运用受试者工作特征曲线( ROC)分别计算出BMI、腰围预测高血压、糖尿病的最佳界值点,运用非条件logistic回归分析不同BMI、腰围状态下调查对象罹患高血压、糖尿病的风险。结果2246名调查对象BMI超重率37.3%,BMI肥胖率9.2%、中心性肥胖率44.9%,BMI预测高血压、糖尿病的最佳界值点分别为男性24.6 kg/m2、26.1 kg/m2,女性23.7 kg/m2、23.6 kg/m2;腰围预测高血压、糖尿病的最佳界值点分别为男性84.8 cm、89.9 cm,女性78.1 cm、78.1 cm。校正混杂因素后,不同类别BMI、腰围人群高血压患病的logistic回归分析表明,中心性肥胖人群的BMI正常、超重、肥胖时患高血压的风险分别是正常人群的1.529(95%CI 1.047~2.234)、2.386(95%CI 1.744~3.263)、3.755(95%CI 2.506~5.627)倍,腰围正常、BMI超重者患高血压的风险是正常人群的1.813(95%CI 1.271~2.586)倍;对糖尿病患病风险的logistic回归分析得出,中心型肥胖人群的BMI正常、超重、肥胖时患糖尿病的风险分别是正常人群的2.282(95%CI 1.225~4.252)、2.964(95%CI 1.741~5.044)、3.900(95% CI 2.077~7.322)倍,腰围正常、BMI肥胖者患糖尿病的风险是正常人群的5.016(95%CI 1.474~17.068)倍。结论男性糖尿病的BMI和腰围预测最佳界值大于高血压,女性糖尿病和高血压的预测最佳界值基本一致。中心型肥胖人群当随着BMI增加时,其罹患高血压的风险增大,腰围对血压的影响更大。 Objective To explore the optimal cut-off points of body mass index ( BMI ) and waist circumference ( WC) in predicting hypertension, diabetes, and the risk of diseases at different status of BMI and WC. Methods With the multistage randomized cluster sampling, questionnaire survey and physical examination were carried out among 2 246 permanent residents aged 18 years and over in 11 communities of Quanshan, Xuzhou. Receiver operating characteristic curves ( ROC) were used to calculate the optimal cut-off points of BMI and WC in detecting hypertension and diabetes. Non-conditional logistic regression was used to analyze the association of the risk of hypertension and diabetes with different status of BMI and WC. Results The rates of overweight, obesity based on BMI and central obesity in 2 246 subjects were 37. 3%, 9. 2%, and 44. 9% respectively. The optimal cut-off points of BMI in predicting hypertension and diabetes were 24. 6 and 26. 1 kg/m2 in men, and 23. 7 and 23. 6 kg/m2 in women, respectively. The optimal cut-off points of waist circumference in predicting hypertension and diabetes were 84. 8 and 89. 9 cm in men, and 78. 1 and 78. 1 cm in women, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, comparing with normal subjects, the risks of hypertension were 1. 529 (95%CI 1. 047-2. 234), 2. 386 (95%CI 1. 744-3. 263), and 3. 755 (95%CI 2. 506-5. 627) in central obesity subjects with normal weight, overweight, and obesity based on BMI, and 1. 813 ( 95% CI 1. 271-2. 586 ) in obese subjects with normal WC. Comparing with normal subjects, the risks of diabetes were 2. 282 (95%CI 1. 225-4. 252), 2. 964 (95%CI 1. 741-5. 044), and 3. 900 (95%CI 2. 077-7. 322) in central obesity subjects with normal weight, overweight, and obesity based on BMI, and 5. 016 (95% CI 1. 474-17. 068) in obese subjects with normal WC. Conclusion The optimal cut-off points of BMI and WC in predicting the risk of diabetes were greater than those for hypertension in men, and similar in predicting diabetes and hypertension in women. The risk of hypertension in central obesity population was increased with the increase of BMI. WC showed greater impact on blood pressure compared with BMI.
出处 《中华内分泌代谢杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期803-807,共5页 Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
关键词 体重指数 腰围 高血压 糖尿病 Body mass index Waist circumference Hypertension Diabetes
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献16

  • 1张红叶,杨军,周北凡,武阳丰,李莹,陶寿淇.我国十组人群脑卒中危险因素的前瞻性研究[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,1996,4(4):150-152. 被引量:91
  • 2Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R. Waist circumference and not body mass index explains obesity-related health risk. Am J Clin Nutr, 2004,79(3 ) : 379-384.
  • 3Bray G. Don' t throw the baby out with the bath water. Am J Clin Nutr, 2004,79 (3) : 347-349.
  • 4Klein S, Allison DB, Heyrnefial SB, et al. Waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk: a consensus statement from shaping america's health:association for weight management and obesity prevention; NAASO, the Obesity Society; the American Society for Nutrition; and the American Diabetes Association. Obesity, 2007,15(5) : 1061-1067.
  • 5Hadaegh F, Zabetian A, Sarbakhsh P,et al. Appropriate cutoff values of anthropometric variables to predict cardiovascular outcomes: 7.6 years follow-up in an Iranian population. Int J Obesity, 2009,33(12) : 1437-1445.
  • 6Decoda Study Group, Nyamdorj R, Qiao Q, et al. BMI compared with central obesity indicators in relation to diabetes and hypertension in Asians. Obesity,2008,16(7) : 1622-1635.
  • 7Zaher ZM,Zambari R,Pheng CS,et al. Optimal cut-off levels to define obesity: body mass index and waist circumference, and their relationship to cardiovascular disease, dyslipidaemia,hypertension and diabetes in Malaysia. Asia Pae J Clin Nutr, 2009,18 (2) : 209-216.
  • 8Wildman RP, Gu D, Reynolds K, et al. Appropriate body mass index and waist circumference cutoffs for categorization of overweight and central adiposity among Chinese adults. Am J Clin Nutr, 2004,80(5) : 1129-1136.
  • 9Wildman RP, Gu D, Reynolds K,et al. Are waist circumference and body mass index independently associated with cardiovascular disease risk in Chinese adults? Am J Clin Nutr, 2005, 82 (6) : 1195-1202,.
  • 10Ye Y, Bao Y, Hou X, et al. Identification of waist circumference cutoffs for abdominal obesity in the Chinese population: a 7.8-year follow-up study in the Shanghai urban area. Int J Obes (Lond), 2009,33 (9) : 1058-1062.

共引文献7965

同被引文献103

引证文献12

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部