期刊文献+

受教育程度与卒中严重程度关联性研究 被引量:1

Correlative study of educational level and stroke severity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的既往关于受教育程度与卒中严重程度关系的研究较少,且这种关系的原因也尚未阐明.文中旨在探讨受教育程度与卒中严重程度的关系.方法回顾性收集2013年10月至2015年4 月于南京军区南京总医院住院的9 0 0例首次急性缺血性卒中患者临床资料.根据患者人院当天国立卫生院神经功能评分( National Institute of Health Stroke Scale,NIHSS)将卒中分为轻型卒中(NIHSS≤3 分)和重型卒中(NIHSS〉 3 分);按照所有患者受教育程度分为文盲/小学、初中、高中及以上3 组.将受教育程度作为社会经济状况指标,采用多因素logistic回归分析方法评估受教育程度与卒中严重程度的关系,并校正性别、短暂性脑缺血发作史、房颤、人院收缩压、空腹血糖等混杂因素.结果在纳人的9 0 0例首次发病的缺血性卒中患者中,轻型卒中组共3 6 5例(40.6%),重型卒中组共5 3 5例(5 9 . 4 % ).单因素分析结果显示,2 组间受教育程度差异有统计学意义( P = 0.002).Logistic回归分析结果显示,与受高中及以上教育程度患者相比,教育程度为小学/文盲患者(0 R =1.456、95%(1:1.049 -2.021、P = 0.025)、初中文化水平(011=1.610、95%(CI:1.126-2.304、P= 0.009)患者更倾向于患有重型缺血性卒中.结论受教育程度与缺血性脑卒中患者神经功能缺损程度具有一定关联.对低受教育程度的高危人群进行重点干预,可降低这类人群卒中的发病率及病情严重程度. Objective Less research has been done on the relationship of educational level and stroke severity,and the causes for the relation are not fully understood. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between educational level and stroke severity. Methods Retrospective analysis was made on the characteristic data of 900 first-ever ischemic stroke patients in our department from October 2013 and April 2015. Patients were divided into mild stroke group( NIHSS≤3,n = 365) and severe stroke group( NIHSS>3,n = 535) according to the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale( NIHSS). The educational level of patients was classified into three categories: illiteracy or primary school,junior school,high school and above. Taking educational level as the marker of socioeconomic status( SES),we used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between educational level and stroke severity,along with the adjustment in sex,previous transient ischemic attack( TIA),atrial fibrillation,blood pressure at admission,fasting blood glucose and other confounding factors. Results Of all the included patients,365( 40.6%) were mild stroke and 535( 59.4%)were severe stroke. The univariate analysis showed significant difference was found in the educational level between two groups( P =0.002). In logistic regression analysis,a higher probability of severe stroke was observed in patients with illiteracy or primary school( OR= 1.456、95%CI: 1.049,2.021、P = 0.025),junior school( OR =1.610、95%CI: 1.126,2.304、P = 0.009) compared with patients with high school and above. Conclusion Educational level is associated with the severity of ischemic stroke. Intervention in high risk population with low educational level is inclined to reduce their incidence and severity.
出处 《医学研究生学报》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第11期1144-1147,共4页 Journal of Medical Postgraduates
基金 江苏省科技支撑计划-社会发展项目(BE2013713)
关键词 受教育程度 卒中严重程度 社会经济状况 Educational level Stroke severity Socioeconomic status
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献65

  • 1刘力生,龚兰生,王文,降压治疗预防卒中再发研究协作组.降压治疗对中国脑血管病患者脑卒中再发预防的多中心随机双盲对照临床研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(7):613-617. 被引量:48
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33020
  • 3中华神经科学会 中华神经外科学会.各类脑血管病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,6:379-379.
  • 4Xu G, Liu X, Wu W, et al. Recurrence after ischemic stroke in chinese patients: impact of uncontrolled modifiable risk factors [ J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2007,23 : 117-120.
  • 5Bamford JM, Sandercock PA, Warlow CP, et al. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients [ J ]. Stroke, 1989,20:828.
  • 6Bogousslavsky J, Kaste M, Skyhoj Olsen T, et al. Risk factors and stroke prevention. European Stroke Initiative ( EUSI ) [ J ]. Cerebrovasc Dis,2000,10 Suppl 3 : 12-21.
  • 7Samsa GP, Cohen SJ, Goldstein LB, et al. Knowledge of risk among patients at increased risk for stroke [J]. Stroke, 1997,28 : 916-921.
  • 8Bugnicourt JM, Chillon JM, Canaple S, et al. Stroke secondary prevention and blood pressure reduction : an observational study of the use of PROGRESS therapy[ J]. Fundam Clin Pharmacol, 2008,22:217-222.
  • 9Muntner P, DeSalvo KB, Wildman RP, et al. Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of cardiovascular disease risk factors among noninstitutionalized patients with a history of myocardial infarction and stroke [ J ]. Am J Epidemiol, 2006,163:913-920.
  • 10李鲁.社会医学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:138-162.

共引文献33116

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部