期刊文献+

基于BN-CREAM的深水井控压井作业风险诱因研究 被引量:6

Research on risk factors of well killing operation in deep-water well control based on BN-CREAM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 深水井控压井作业是有效控制溢流演化为井喷事故的二级井控工艺屏障。为提高深水井控压井作业可靠性,采用BN-CREAM方法对其风险诱因进行研究。结合深水井控压井作业特点,考虑共因失效等因素,采用贝叶斯网络方法建立深水井控压井作业风险演化模型。应用人因可靠性分析CREAM法计算深水压井人因失误先验概率,参考海洋可靠性数据手册OREDA确定深水井控设备失效先验概率。依托贝叶斯网络的逆向推理能力辨识压井作业的主要风险节点,从而实现对深水井控压井作业风险诱因的有效预测和评估。研究表明:深水井控压井作业共包含6个关键风险根节点,且压井作业人因可靠性要低于设备可靠性;3级子节点"压井方法选择不合理"对深水压井作业的成功起到至关重要的作用,需进一步开展风险分析研究。 The deep- water well killing operation is the secondary well control technological barrier,which can effectively prevent the evolution from overflow to blowout accident. In order to improve the reliability of deep- water well killing operation,the BN- CREAM method was applied to study the risk factors. Combined with the characteristics of deep- water well killing operation,a risk evolution model of deep- water well killing operation was established by using Bayesian network(BN) method considering the common cause failure and other factors. The cognitive reliability and error analysis method(CREAM) for human reliability analysis was adopted to calculate the prior probability of human error in deep- water well killing operation,and the prior probability of equipment failure in deep- water well control was determined referring to Offshore Reliability Data( OREDA). The main risk nodes of well killing operation were identified relying on the reverse reasoning capacity of BN,thereby the effective prediction and evaluation of risk factors for deep- water well killing operation can be achieved. The results showed that the deep- water well killing operation includes six key risk root nodes,and the human reliability is lower than that of equipment. The third grade child node " unreasonable choice of well killing methods" plays a crucial role for the success of deep- water well killing operation,being necessary to carry out a further risk analysis.
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期86-91,共6页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
基金 国家工信部第七代超深水钻井平台创新专项
关键词 深水压井工艺 风险识别 CREAM 贝叶斯网络 后验推理 deep-water well killing technology risk identification CREAM Bayesian network posterior reasoning
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1王志远,邢廷瑞,华美瑞,李红伟,张军.深水压井节流管线内的气体交换效应分析[J].石油钻探技术,2013,41(3):19-24. 被引量:3
  • 2高永海,孙宝江,曹式敬,宋林松,史作法.应用事故树法对深水井控进行风险评估[J].石油钻采工艺,2008,30(2):23-27. 被引量:35
  • 3刘刚,李伯尧,徐加兴,夏向阳,张勇.应用贝叶斯网络识别深水井控主要风险诱因[J].中国安全科学学报,2015,25(5):157-163. 被引量:11
  • 4Skogdalen J E, Vinnem J E. Quantitative risk analysis of oil and gas drilling, using Deepwater Horizon as case study[ J]. Reliability En- gineering & System Safety, 2012, 100:58 -66.
  • 5陈洁,陈国明,李新宏,师吉浩.深水关井作业可靠性贝叶斯-GO法分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2016,26(4):144-149. 被引量:8
  • 6Li X, Chen G, Zhu I-I. Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network [ J ]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016 ( 103 ) : 163 - 173.
  • 7《海洋钻井手册》编委会.海洋钻井手册[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009:588.
  • 8Skalle P, Podio A L. Trends extracted from 800 Gulf Coast blow- outs during 1960 - 1996[ C]. IADC/SPE drilling conference, Soci- ety of Petroleum Engineers, 1998.
  • 9Abimbola M, Khan F, Khakzad 51. Dynamic safety risk analysis of offshore drilling[ J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process In- dustries, 2014(30): 74-85.
  • 10RAUSANDM(Norway).风险评估理论、方法与应用[M].刘一骝,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2013:76-80.

二级参考文献61

共引文献82

同被引文献50

引证文献6

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部