期刊文献+

多源遥感影像水体指数的交互对比 被引量:4

Cross-comparison of MNDWI index between imageries from different sensors
原文传递
导出
摘要 在对地观测系统中,Landsat和EO-1数据比较适合于监测城市水体变化。但是这两种传感器数据的水体指数之间的关系不清楚,针对这一问题。该文利用两对同日过空的Landsat-7ETM+与EO-1ALI影像来查明二者水体指数之间的定量关系,通过回归统计分析来求出两种传感器水体指数之间的转换方程。结果表明,Landsat-7ETM+与EO-1ALI影像分别基于DN数据、IACM反射率数据计算的MNDWI水体指数间,均存在较好的线性相关关系,决定系数均在0.75以上;基于EO-1ALI的MNDWI指数影像信息更为丰富,因为其动态范围大于Landsat-7ETM+。 Of the medium-scale earth observation systems, Landsat and EO-1 data are both suitable for monitoring the dynamics of the urban water. Nevertheless, the relationship between the water index of the two sensors has not yet been revealed so far. To quantitatively investigate thisrelationship, this stud- y crossly compares the MNDWI of Landsat-7ETM+ andEO-1 ALI sensors based on two tandem image pairs. Regression analysis was usedto examine the quantitative relationship through the scatter plots of the water index valuesof the two sensors. This yielded the models for the conversion between two sensors water index. Results indicate that the MNDWI of Landsat ETM+ and EO-1 ALI have a very strong positive relationship, and the coefficient of determination is higher than 0.75. The MNDWI index imageinformation of EO-1 ALIis more abundant, because of its greater dynamic range.
出处 《测绘科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第11期194-199,共6页 Science of Surveying and Mapping
基金 福建省自然科学基金项目(2012D104)
关键词 交互比较 MNDWI水体指数 ALI ETM+ Cross-comparison MNDWI ALl ETM+
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1TEILLET P, BARKER J, MARKHAM B, et al. Radio- metric cross-calibration of the Landsat-7 ETM~ and Landsat 5 TM sensors based on tandem data sets[J], Remote Sensing o{ Environment, 2001,78 (1-2) : 30-54.
  • 2BRYANT R, MORAN M, MCELROY S. Data conti- nuity of earth obserbing 1 (EO-1) advanced land ima- ger (ALl) and Landsat TM and ETM+ [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2003, 41(6) :1204-1214.
  • 3LOBELL D, ASNER G. Comparison of earth oberseving-1 ALI and Landsat ETMq- for crop identification and yield prediction in Mexieo~J~. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2003,41 (6) : 1277-1282.
  • 4CHANDER G, MEYER D, HELDER D. Cross calibra- tion of the Landsat-7 ETM + and EO-1 ALl sensor [J~. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2004,42(12) :2821-2831.
  • 5NEUENSCHWANDER A,CRAWFORD M, RINGROSE S. Results from the EO-1 experiment-A comparative study of earth observing-1 advanced land imager (ALI) and Landsat ETM-k data for land cover mapping in the oka- vango delta, botswanaFJ~. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2005,26 (19) : 4321-4337.
  • 6MIURA T, YOSHIOKA H, FUJIWARA K, et al. In- ter-comparison of ASTER and MODIS surface reflec- tance and vegetation index products for synergistic ap- plications to natural resource monitoring[J]. Sensors, 2008,8 (4) .. 2480-2499.
  • 7张铁军,徐涵秋.基于MNDWI水体指数的ASTER与ETM+影像交互比较研究[J].宇航学报,2010,31(4):1244-1252. 被引量:10
  • 8李春华,徐涵秋,陈荔聪.ASTER和Landsat-7ETM+两种多光谱传感器影像的交互对比[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2010,30(9):2518-2524. 被引量:10
  • 9徐涵秋,张铁军.ASTER与Landsat ETM+植被指数的交互比较[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2011,31(7):1902-1907. 被引量:22
  • 10徐涵秋.基于影像的Landsat TM/ETM^+数据正规化技术[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2007,32(1):62-66. 被引量:76

二级参考文献65

共引文献1612

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部