期刊文献+

老年人轻度认知功能障碍的危险因素分析 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨杭州地区>70岁老年人轻度认知功能障碍(MCI)的流行病学特征及相关危险因素,以期早期预防与干预。方法随机调查2015年4月至10月年龄>70岁老年人217例,并采用蒙特利尔量表(MoCA)对入选老年人进行一对一访谈。结果 MCI的检出率为63.6%(138/217)。MCI和认知正常组在受教育程度(P〈0.001)、婚姻状况(P=0.002)、高血压病史(P〈0.001)、颈动脉内膜-中层厚度(P=0.005)差异均有统计学意义。二元Logistic回归分析显示,低教育程度(OR=4.6,95%CI2.192~9.679,P〈0.001)、无配偶者(OR=2.6,95%CI1.143~5.967,P=0.023)、高血压病史(OR=4.066,95%CI 2.096~7.889,P〈0.001)是MCI发生的独立危险因素。结论改善婚姻状况和提高受教育程度可能是降低老年人MCI发生的重要因素。对存在高血压的患者注意监测其认知功能,以期早期干预治疗。 Objective To study the Hangzhou area 70 years or older with mild cognitive impairment(mild cognitive impairment,MCI) epidemiological characteristics and risk factors,in order to early prevention and intervention. Methods The random survey in April 2015-October 2015 in Hangzhou Five Yunshan Nursing Home more than 70 years of age or older 217,using Montreal Scale(MoCA)for selected one on one interviews with the elderly. Results MCI detection rate of 63.6%(138/217). MCI and cognitively normal group,level of education(P〈0.001), marital status(P=0.002),hypertension(P〈0.001),in the carotid artery intima - media thickness on(P=0.005)were significant differences exist. Two yuan Logistic regression analysis showed that low levels of education(OR education=4.6,95%CI 2.192~9.679,P〈0.001),without a spouse(OR marriage=2.6,95%CI 1.143~5.967,P=0.023),there is history of hypertension(OR=4.066,95%CI 2.096~7.889,P〈0.001)were independent risk factors for MCI occurred. Conclusion Improving marital status and educational level increase may be important factors in reducing the occurrence of MCI elderly. Early intervention should be performed by noting the presence of hypertension patients to monitor their cognitive function.
作者 吴都 王赛英
出处 《浙江临床医学》 2016年第11期2046-2047,共2页 Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
关键词 认知功能障碍 痴呆 危险因素 Mild cognitive impairment Dementia Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1马岁岁,秦侠,陈若陵,胡志.负性生活事件与老年抑郁症发病率的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(3):157-159. 被引量:35
  • 2Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol, 1999,56:303-308.
  • 3Chertkow H. Mild cognitive impairment. Curr Opin Neurol,2002, 15:401-407.
  • 4Thompson SA, Hedges JR. Mild cognitive impairment: clinically useful but currently ill-defined concept? Neurocase, 2002,8:405-410.
  • 5Folstein MF, Folsteln SE, McHugh PR. " Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res, 1975,12 : 189-198.
  • 6Ihl R, Frolich L, Dierks T, et al. Differential validity of psychometric tests in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Psychiatry Res, 1992,44:93-106.
  • 7Tombaugh TN,Melntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1992,40:922-935.
  • 8Wind AW, Schellevis FG, Van Staveren G, et al. Limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination in diagnosing dementia in general practice. Int J C, eriatr Psychiatry, 1997,12 : 101-108.
  • 9Petersen RC, Stevens JC, Gangnli M, et al. Practice parameter: early detection of dementia: mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review ). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology, 2001,56:1133-1142.
  • 10Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2005,53:695-699.

共引文献354

同被引文献45

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部