期刊文献+

再次剖宫产子宫下段厚度的术前超声检查价值及其高危因素分析 被引量:3

Ultrasonographic value for lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section and its risk factors analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨术前超声检查测量再次剖宫产子宫下段厚度的价值及其相关高危因素。方法选择2013年8月-2015年5月在上海市长宁区妇幼保健院行常规产科检查的孕妇,收集有剖宫产史且再次妊娠选择剖宫产的孕妇313例进行回顾性研究。于孕38~39周经腹超声检查测量子宫下段厚度,并与直视下子宫下段的厚度进行比较,观察子宫下段不全破裂的发生情况。根据孕妇的年龄、孕次、既往剖宫产次数、前次剖宫产术后是否感染、前次剖宫产是否临产、两次手术间隔时间和前次新生儿体重进行分组,比较各组孕妇子宫下段的厚度。结果术前经腹超声检查的子宫下段平均厚度显著厚于术中直视下厚度(t=10.169,P〈0.001),两者具有相关性(r=0.682,P=0.000)。术前经腹超声检查子宫下段厚度≥3mm者的子宫下段不全破裂发生率显著低于术前经腹超声检查子宫下段厚度〈3mm者(P〈0.05)。根据不同高危因素分组发现,不同年龄、孕次、既往剖宫产次数,前次剖宫产术后是否感染、前次剖宫产是否临产、两次手术间隔时间不同和前次新生儿体重不同的产妇间子宫下段厚度的差异均无统计学意义(P值均〉O.05)。结论影响剖宫产后再次妊娠时子宫下段厚度的高危因素尚不明确,但术前超声检查监测子宫下段厚度可以作为临床医师判断子宫下段不全破裂的指标。 Objective To evaluate the predictive value of ultrasound in lower uterine segment thickness of women with previous caesarean section and to estimate related risk factors. Methods In this retrospective study, 313 pregnant women who had undergone cesarean section, and took prenatal examination and selected Cesarean section during pregnancy in Shanghai Changning Maternity & Infant Health Hospital from August 2013 to May 2015 were included. The lower uterine segment thickness was measured by abdominal ultrasonography between 38 and 39 weeks' gestation and compared with the visual thickness during caesarean section. The occurrence of incomplete rupture of the uterus was observed. All the pregnant women were divided into different groups according to maternal age, gravidity, the number of previous caesarean section, inter-delivery interval and characteristics of the previous caesarean sections including labor status, birth weight and postoperative infections, and the thickness of lower uterine segment of each group were compared. Results The full lower uterine segment thickness observed by transabdominal sonography was significantly greater than that observed during caesarean section (t= 10. 169, P〈0. 001), and they had a correction (r = 0. 682, P = 0. 000). A higher incidence of incomplete rupture of uterus in women with a full lower uterine segment thickness 〈 3 mm observed by transabdominal sonography than women with a full lower uterine segment thickness ≥3 mm (P〈0.05). There were no association between lower uterine segment thickness and the factors including maternal age, gravidity, birth weight, labor at previous cesarean section, interdelivery interval or postoperative infections (all P〉0.05). Conclusion The risk factors related to lower uterine segment thickness is unclear in pregnant women with repeated caesarean section. Preoperative ultrasound monitoring of the lower uterine segment may be used as an indicator of the incomplete rupture of the uterus.
出处 《上海医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期532-535,共4页 Shanghai Medical Journal
关键词 剖宫产 子宫下段厚度 高危因素 超声 Caesarean section Lower uterine segment thickness Risk factors Transabdominal sonography
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1韩欢,秦敏,许厚琴,杜莉,朱丽萍.上海市剖宫产率及其影响因素[J].中国妇幼保健,2010,25(22):3077-3080. 被引量:46
  • 2ASAKURA H, NAKAI A, ISHIKAWA G, et al. Prediction of uterine dehiscence .by measuring lower uterine segment thickness prior to the onset of labor: evaluation by transvaginal ultrasonography[J]. J Nippon Med Sch, 2000, 67(5) : 352-356.
  • 3LANDON M B, HAUTH J C, LEVENO K J, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004,351(25): 2581-2589.
  • 4CHAPMAN K, MEIRE H, CHAPMAN R. The value of serial ultrasounds in the management of recurrent uterine scar rupture[J]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1994, 101(6) : 549- 551.
  • 5SEN S, MALIK S, SALHAN S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section[J]. Int J Gynaeeol Obstet, 2004, 87(3) : 215-219.
  • 6JASTROW N, CHAILLET N, ROBERGE S, et al. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2010, 32(4) .. 321-327.
  • 7JASTROW N, GAUTHIER R J, GAGNON G, et al. Impact of labor at prior cesarean on lower uterine segment thickness in subsequent pregnancy [J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 202(6); 563. el-e7.
  • 8BIRUBI L, ARIAL M, GAGNON G, et al. Factors associated with lower uterine segment thickness near term in women with previous caesarean section [ J ] J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2011, 33(6): 581-587.
  • 9ZIMMER E Z, BARDIN R, TAMIR A, et al. Sonographic imaging oI cervical scars after Cesarean section [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 23(6) : 594-598.
  • 10BUJOLD E, GAUTHIER R J. Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 115(5) : 1003-1006.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Annika Karlstroma, Regina Engstrom - Olofsson, Jan Thomas et al. Swedish caregivers'attitudes towards caesarean section on maternal request [J].Women and Birth, 2009, 22:57.
  • 2Jeroen van Dillen, Frans Lira, Evert van Rijssel. Introducing caesarean section audit in a regional teaching hospital in the Netherlands[J]. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2008, 139:151.
  • 3Engin Oral, Arzu Cagdas. Perinatal and maternal outcomes of fetal macrosomia[J]. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2001, 99:167.
  • 4Richard F, Ouedraogo C, De Brouwere V. Quality cesarean delivery in Quagadougou, Burkina Faso : A comprehensive approach [J]. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2008, 103 : 283.
  • 5张秀红,李琳.蛛网膜下腔联合硬膜外镇痛在分娩中的作用[J].中国妇幼保健,2008,23(31):4496-4496. 被引量:2
  • 6计文映,薛梅.剖宫产术对母婴的近远期影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2009,1(1):23-26. 被引量:7
  • 7朱丽萍,秦敏,金辉,李田娥,裘佳敏,王安娣.上海市导乐陪伴分娩开展状况及效果分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2002,17(7):398-400. 被引量:10

共引文献45

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部