组织双元化构筑竞争优势被引量：4

Organizational ambidexterity building competitive advantage

导出

摘要本研究旨在探讨组织双元化构筑竞争优势的过程、特征与原因。本文以联想研发组织为案例研究对象,打开了中国研发组织双元化构筑竞争优势的"黑箱",揭示了其构筑过程、特征、结果与演化路径,总结了组织双元化演化的过程模型,并从外部利益相关者——全球化竞争对手并购的角度,分析了复杂嵌套组织的双元化促进"以小并大"企业的融合,补充与丰富了组织双元化的理论体系,弥补了现有研究忽略企业外部利益相关者视角的不足。研究发现联想全球化成功的原因在于其复杂嵌套组织的双元化,并由此获得了竞争优势。本文也分析了联想吸收能力单极化的问题。实践意义在于指导中国企业通过研发组织双元化,获得可持续发展的创新能力与竞争优势。 This research aims to take Lenovo R＆D organization as a case study, to systematically explore evolution path of organization ambidexterity, building competitive advantage for the processes, characteristics and reason. This research find that the key success fac- tor of Lenovo for globalization is its competitive advantages built by its R＆D organizational ambidexterity. This paper summarizes the process model of ambidexterity building competitive advantage. In addition, this article analyzed the reason of complex nested organiza- tional ambidexterity promotes the fusion after emerging market corporate mergers and acquisitions developed multinational companies. It also reveals the literal problem of absorptive capacity for Chinese manufacture. The practical significance of this study is to guide Chi- nese enterprises to achieve organization ambidexterity, to obtain sustainable development competence for innovation and competitive ad- vantage in globalization.

作者丁玲吴金希叶冉

机构地区清华大学社会科学学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第11期1700-1707,共8页 Studies in Science of Science

基金中国博士后科学基金(2016M591197) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172176 71172004)

关键词组织双元化竞争优势跨国并购吸收能力 organizational ambidexterity competitive advantage cross- border M＆A absorptive capacity

分类号 F272 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献22

1O' Reilly C A, Tushman M L. Organizational ambidex- terity: Past, present, and future [ J]. Academy of Man- agement Perspectives, 2013, 27 (4): 324-338.
2Patel P C, Terjesen S, l,i D. Enhancing effects of man- ufacturing flexibility through operational absorptive ca- pacity and operationalambidexterity [J]. Journal of Op- erations Management, 2012, 30:201 -220.
3Rothaermel F T, Alexandre M Y. Ambidexterily in tech- nolngy sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive ca- pacity [ J ]. Organization Science, 2009, 20 (4) : 759 - 780.
4Duncan R B. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures tbr innovation [ A ]. Kilmann R H, Pnndy L R, Selvin D. The Management of Organization [C]. North- Holland, New York, 1976, 1: 167 - 188.
5March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organization- al learning [ J] Organization Science,1991,2:71 - 87.
6Eisenhardt K M, Furr N R, Bingham C B. Crossroads - microfoundations of performance : Balancing efficiencyand flexibility in dynamic Environments [ J]. Organiza- tion Science, 2010, 21(6): 1263-1273.
7Gupta A K, Smith K G,Shalley C E. The interplay be- tween exploration and exploitation [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 4 : 693 - 706.
8Burgelman R A. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research [ J ]. Organization Science, 1991, 2:239 - 262.
9Simsek Z. Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a mul- tilevel understanding [ J]. Journal of Management Stud- ies, 2009, 46(4) :597 -624.
10Lin H, McDonough III E F. Cognitive frames, learning mechanisms, and innovation ambidexterity [ J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31 ( S1 ) : 170 - 188.