期刊文献+

一种基于图的DL-Lite本体最小不可满足保持子集的计算方法 被引量:2

A Graph-Based Approach for Calculating Minimal Unsatisfiability-Preserving Subsets of Ontology in DL-Lite
下载PDF
导出
摘要 演变中的本体常出现不一致性问题,这将导致标准推理失效.针对不一致性问题,最小不可满足保持子集能够提供本体中概念不可满足的解释.计算最小不可满足保持子集是本体工程中的一项重要的非标准推理任务,但多数计算方法须借助外部的推理机,导致计算的效率不高.为了减少对推理机的依赖,本文提出了一种基于图的最小不可满足保持子集的计算方法.新的方法面向DL-Lite描述逻辑家族,将DL-Lite本体转换成图,将本体中的最小不可满足保持子集转换成图上的最小不可满足保持路径对.对比实验表明,基于图的方法提高了计算的效率和稳定性. Inconsistency often occurs during ontology evolution,and leads to the invalidity of standard reasoning.Minimal unsatisfiablility-preserving sub-TBox( MUPS) can provide an explanation of the unsatisfiability of a concept in an ontology. Finding all MUPS is an important nonstandard reasoning task in ontology engineering. Most of the approaches for calculating MUPS are built on external description logic reasoners. However,a reasoner-based method can hardly achieve positive efficiency and stability. In this paper,we propose a reasoner-independent approach to calculating MUPS using graph representation. We first transform DL ontologies to graphs,and find MUPS by computing the minimal unsatisfiability-preserving path-pair( MUPP) based on the transformed graphs. We implement and evaluate our approach. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach performs well in efficiency and stability.
出处 《电子学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第9期2040-2045,共6页 Acta Electronica Sinica
基金 国家"八六三"高技术研究发展计划基金项目(No.2015AA015406) 国家自然科学基金(No.61272378) 江西省教育厅青年科学基金项目(No.GJJ12643)
关键词 本体 描述逻辑 不一致处理 最小不可满足保持子集 ontology description logic inconsistency handling minimal unsatisfiablility-preserving sub-TBox
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献19

  • 1Qi Guilin, Haase P, Huang Zhisheng, et al. A kernel revision operator for terminologies--Algorithms and Evaluation [G] //LNCS 5318: Proc of the 7th Int Conf on Semantic Web. Berlin: Springer, 2008: 419-434.
  • 2Schlobach S. Diagnosing terminologies [C]//Proc of the 20th National Conf on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park: AAA1, 2005:670-675.
  • 3Schlobach S, Huang Zhisheng, Cornet R, et al. Debugging incoherent terminologies [J]. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2007, 39(3): 317-349.
  • 4Schlobach S, Cornet R. Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies [C]//Proc of the 17th Int Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2003:355-362.
  • 5Kalyanpur A, Parsia B, Sirin E, et al. Repairing unsatisfiable concepts in OWL ontologies [G] //LNCS 4011: Proc of the 3rd European Conf on Semantic Web. Berlin: Springer, 2006: 170-184.
  • 6Kalyanpur A, Parsia B, Sirin E, et al. Debugging unsatisfiable classes in OWL ontologies [J]. Journal of Web Semantics, 2007, 3(4): 268-293.
  • 7Kalyanpur A, Parsia B, Horridge M, et ai. Finding all justifications of OWL-DL entailments [G] //LNCS 4825: Proe of the 6th Int Conf on Semantic Web and the 2nd Asian Conference on Semantic Web. Berlin: Springer, 2007: 267- 280.
  • 8Wang Hal, Horridge M, Rector A L, et al. Debugging OWL-DL ontologies: A heuristic approach [G] //LNCS 3729: Proc of the 4tb Int Conf on Semantic Web. Berlin: Springer, 2005:745-757.
  • 9Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness D, et al. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Application [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2003: 47-54.
  • 10Calvanese D, Giacomo G D, Lembo D, et al. Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description logics: The DL-Lite family [J]. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2007, 39(3), 385-429.

共引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部