徘徊与求变:中国文论当代重建的三个维度

Wandering and Innovation:Three Dimensions of Contemporary Chinese Literary Reconstruction

近年来,文学理论界一直在倡导重新挖掘、整理和转化中国传统文论中的资源,激活其中有生命活力的精神,对过去学界一味倒向西方理论怀抱、唯西方马首是瞻的做法做了反思,这种清理是有必要的。但要促进传统的古典文论的转化和创新,重新建构当代中国文学理论体系,仍然离不开三个重要的理论维度:首先是立足于本民族的文化语境,挖掘传统文论资源,激活其中有价值和可生长的生命活力,形成与现当代文论的对接;其次在建立古代文论主体性,立足于民族文化的基础上,不要忽视吸纳和借鉴西方文论中有真知灼见的理论成果的重要性,否则会陷入盲目排外的自闭状态;第三是强调文论发展的当代意识,无论是立足传统去创新,还是中西对话突显民族特色,关键问题是能否让文学理论回应当下文艺创作的现实,能否面对媒介文化、消费文化、流行文化、青年亚文化等做出及时回应和恰当判断,发出自己的声音。

In recent years,literary theorists have been advocating the mining,sorting and transformation of Chinese traditional literary resources,including activation of the vitality of the spirit in the past native academic theory,rethinking the blindly backward westernization,and the only West' s way followed in practice,and this kind of clean-up is necessary.But to promote the traditional classical literary theory of transformation and innovation,to reconstruct the theoretical system of Chinese contemporary literature,still can not do without three important theoretical dimensions:The first is based on the cultural context of the nation' s traditional literary resource mining,to activate its valuable vitality,to constitute to link the traditional and contemporary literary theory;the Second thing is to establish the subjective of Ancient China' s Literature should be based on the foundation of the national culture,and to absorb and learn from the results of Western Literary and critical theory is necessary ptherwise we will fall into the blind xenophobic autistic state;The third is to emphasize contemporary literary developing consciousness,whether it is based on tradition to innovate,or to highlight the dialogue between Chinese and Western national characteristics.The key question is whether to let literary theory and artistic creation in response to the current reality,to face the media culture,consumer culture popular culture,youth subcultures,etc.to make timely and appropriate response to judgment,and make their own voices.