摘要
目的:观察壮医药线点灸所用不同的药线(浸泡药线的方药是否含麝香)和点灸手法的轻重对抑郁症的临床疗效及安全性的影响。方法:选择100例抑郁症患者随机分为5组,每组20例。观察组1选用含麝香的传统药方浸泡的药线,用轻手法治疗;观察组2选用含麝香的传统药方浸泡的药线,用重手法治疗;观察组3选用不含麝香的传统药方浸泡的药线,用轻手法治疗;观察组4选用不含麝香的传统药方浸泡的药线,用重手法治疗;西药对照组口服百忧解胶囊,疗程6周。观察治疗前后患者汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17项)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、临床疗效总评量表(CGI)评分变化,以HAMD-17减分率为主要疗效指标进行临床疗效评价。并进行安全性指标评价。结果:治疗后各组HAMD-17项、SDS、CGI评分与治疗前比较均显著减少(P<0.01,P<0.05);观察组1-4组及西药对照组总有效率依次为90.0%、85.0%、90.0%、85.0%、95.0%,5组比较差异无统计学意义;HAMD-17项评分变化比较,治疗第2、4周观察组1与观察组2、观察组3、观察组4之间比较均有显著差异(P<0.01,P<0.05);安全性评价,观察组1、观察组3没有发生任何不良反应,观察组2不良反应率为40%,观察组4不良反应率为45%,西药对照组不良反应率50%,观察组1、观察组3不良反应率与观察组2、观察组4、西药对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:壮医药线点灸选用含麝香传统药方浸泡的药线,并用轻手法点灸治疗抑郁症起效更快、更安全,患者依从性更好。
Objective: To study the effects of different threads(soaked in musk solution or not) and manipulation of moxibustion(heavy or gentle) of Zhuang medicine on the clinical efficacy and safety of depression treatment. Methods: One hundred cases of depression patients were included and divided into five groups(A, B, C, D and E) with 20 cases in each group respectively, first four groups were observation groups while group E was the control group. Group A accepted the treatment with musk threads and gentle manipulation; group B accepted the treatment with musk threads and heavy manipulation; group C accepted the treatment with non-musk threads and gentle manipulation; group D accepted the treatment with non-musk threads and heavy manipulation; group E accepted the treatment with oral Prozac Capsules. All the patients were treated for six weeks. The value of Hamilton's Depression Scale(HAMD-17) was taken as the major efficacy index to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety before and after the treatment, along with Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS) and Clinical Global Impression(CGI).Results: The value of HAMD-17, SDS as well as CGI were significantly reduced after six-weeks anti-depression treatment in five groups(P〈0.01, P〈0.05). The total effective rate of five groups were 90.0%, 85.0%, 90.0%, 85.0% and 95.0% respectively, and there was no statistical significance among those five groups. As to the value of HAMD-17, there was significant difference between group A and group B, C, D in the second and the fourth week(P〈0.01, P〈0.05) respectively. As to the safety valuation, there was no adverse reaction in group A and C, while the adverse reaction ratio of group B, D and E was 40%, 45% and 50% respectively; moreover, there was statistical significance in the adverse reaction ratio between group A, C and group B, D, E(P〈0.01). Conclusion: Using medicated thread moxibustion of Zhuang medicine with musk threads and gentle manipulation was the better and safer treatment for depression.
出处
《中华中医药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第11期4831-4834,共4页
China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
基金
广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(No.桂科攻14124004-1-18)
广西高校科研重点项目资助(No.KY2015ZD061)~~
关键词
壮医药线点灸
抑郁症
规范化技术
临床疗效
安全性
Medicated thread moxibustion of Zhuang medicine
Depression
Standardized techniques
Clinical efficacy
Safety