期刊文献+

高通量测序胚胎植入前遗传学筛查在复发性流产患者中的应用 被引量:6

Application of next-generation genome sequencing preimplantation genetic screening in recurrent miscarriage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨高能量测序胚胎植入前遗传学筛查技术对复发性流产患者辅助生殖临床结局的影响。方法 32例复发性流产患者分为NGS-PGS组(n=15)与非PGS组(n=17)。NGS-PGS组胚胎行NGS筛查,选择染色体正常胚胎植入,进而对两组临床结局进行比较。结果 NGS-PGS组中平均每个周期活检囊胚2.8±2.04个,染色体整倍囊胚20枚,占47.62%,非整倍体囊胚22枚,占52.38%,胎着床率(61.54%)高于非PGS组(45.24%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),NGS-PGS组早期流产率(9.09%)显著低于非PGS组(29.41%)(P<0.05)。结论经NGS-PGS,植入染色体整倍性胚胎,可使复发性流产患者获得更高的胚胎着床率及较低的早期流产率,是复发性流产患者临床治疗的有效途径。 Objective:To investigate the effects of next-generation genome sequencing-preimplantation genetic screening(NGS-PGS) on the clinical outcome of assisted reproduction for recurrent miscarriage(RM) patients. Methods:The RM patients were divided into NGS-PGS group(n=15) and non-PGS group(n=17). In NGS-PGS group,the euploid embryos identified by NGS technology were transferred. The clinical outcomes in two groups were compared. Results:In NGS-PGS group,the euploid embryos accounted for 47.62%(20/42). The embryo implantation rate(61.54%) in NGS-PGS group was higher than those in non-PGS group(45.24%,P0.05). The early pregnancy loss rate was 9.09% in the former,lower than that in the latter(29.41%,P0.05). Conclusion:Identification of the euploid embryos by NGS-PGS then transferred such embryos,can reduce the number of embryos transferred(ET),and decrease the risks of multiple pregnancy. Furthermore,it can result in the higher embryo implantation rate and the lower early pregnancy loss rate. Application of NGS-PGS is a valid clinical approach to treatment in assisted reproduction for RM patients.
出处 《中国优生与遗传杂志》 2016年第9期89-91,74,共4页 Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity
关键词 胚胎植入前遗传学筛查(PGS) 新一代测序(NGS) 复发性流产(RM) Preimplantation genetic screening(PGS) Next-generation genome sequencing(NGS) Recurrent miscarriage(RM)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1ZhangC,et al. Association between Seram TNF-alpha Levels andRecurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage :A Meta- analysis[J]. Am JReprodImmunol,2016,75 (2):86-93.
  • 2ZhangT,et al. Antithrombotic Treatment for Recurrent Miscarriage :Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2015,94 (45) :el732.
  • 3MartinJ,et al. The impact of next-generation sequencingtechnology on pn implantation genetic diagnosis and screening [J].Fertil Steril,2013,99 (4):1054-61 e3.
  • 4KorosiT,O Torcik. G Vajta. Update on preimplantation geneticdiagnosis and screening. Orv Hetil, 2014,155 (35) :1375-82.
  • 5SahinL, et al. Is preimplantation genetic diagnosis the ideal embryoselection method in aneuploidy screening.[J]. Kaohsiung J MedSci,2014,30 (10) :491-8.
  • 6LuL, et al. Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosisand screening[J].: Assist Reprod Genet. 2016.
  • 7Abul-HusnNS,et al. Implementation and utilization of genetic. testing in personalized medicine[J]. Pharmgenomics Pers Med,2014,7 :227-40.
  • 8GeraedtsJ, K Sermon. Preimplantation genetic screening 2.0 :thetheory[J]. Mol Hum Reprod, 2016.
  • 9CavalcanteMB, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor andreproductive medicine :A review[J]. Iran J Reprod Med,2015,13(4):195-202.
  • 10HuangL,et al. Single-Cell Whole-Genome Amplificationand Sequencing :Methodology and Applications[J]. Annu RevGenomics Hum Gene;t, 2015,16 :79-102.

同被引文献43

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部