摘要
互联网环境拓展了审判公开的空间,使审判公开"选择权"的重要性越发突显。它一方面关系到社会公众是主动获取,还是被动接受审判信息;另一方面关系到社会公众获取"一手的"、全面的,还是"二手的"、部分的审判信息。互联网环境下审判公开"选择权"不仅有立法上的,而且有理论上的存在根据。以"利益保障说"和程序正义为理论根据,明确公开"选择权"主体,包括案件当事人、诉讼代理人、旁听人员、新闻媒体和社会公众,内容进一步分为传统公开方式、网络公开方式的方式选择权和庭审情况、裁判结果的具体内容公开选择权,人民法院在进行利益衡量后最终行使审判公开"决定权"。针对互联网环境下审判公开"选择权"行使提出建议,具体落实。
The Internet environment expanded the trial of the open space,made the trial public increasingly highlight the importance of options. On the one hand,it is related to the social public initiative of inquiry,or receiving trial information; On the other hand,it is related to the social public access to originals,comprehensive,or second-hand,part of the trial information. Under the Internet environment,public trial"options"has not only existed in the legislation,and there is a theoretical basis. With the basis of the interests guarding and theory of justice procedure,clear public options of the subject,including parties and their agents,bystander,media and social public. Furthermore,it should be divided into traditional mode and network public option,the trial and the results of the specific content of public options,in the interests of the balance of the people's court after the final exercise trial publicly"decision". Finally,in view of the Internet environment public trial suggests "options"to exercise,the concrete implementation.
作者
刘文魁
兰鹏
LIU Wenkui LAN Peng(School of Law, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, Chin)
出处
《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》
北大核心
2016年第6期67-71,共5页
Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
基金
重庆市社会科学规划项目:我国信息网络安全现状及其治理法治化研究(2015YBFX099)
中国博士后科学基金第58批面上资助项目:西部地区博士后人才资助计划(2015M582750XE)
重庆市博士后科研特别资助项目:大数据时代的信息安全危机与法律应对--以网络社会管理创新为视阈(XM2015118)
关键词
审判公开
程序正义
公开选择权
trial publicly
procedural justice
public options