期刊文献+

我国语文课程标准存在的问题及改进——来自中美澳课程标准的比较 被引量:5

Problems of Chinese Curriculum Standards in China and Countermeasures——Based on Comparison with American and Australian Curriculum Standards
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语文课程标准是语文教学活动的风向标。通过中美澳三国母语课程标准比较分析发现,我国语文在课程标准结构上存在能力表现标准缺失,课程目标缺乏清晰可操作性,课标层级缺乏组织性等问题。借鉴美澳课程标准的优点,我国课程标准需要在课标结构上完善能力表现标准,增强课标表述的清晰规范性,让课标成为教学与评价的依据。 Chinese Curriculum Standards is the vane of Chinese teaching activities. Through the comparative analysis of Chinese,American and Australian language curriculum standards,we found out the deficiency of performance standards in the structure of curriculum standards,lack of clear operability in curriculum objective and lack of sense of organization in the hierarchy of curriculum standards. Drawing lessons from the advantages of American and Australian curriculum standards,capacity performance standards in the structure of curriculum standards should be perfected,and the normalization of standards' expression should be enhanced to let the curriculum standards become the basis of teaching and evaluation.
作者 杨钦芬 YANG Qinfen
出处 《天津师范大学学报(基础教育版)》 2016年第4期58-62,共5页 Journal of Tianjin Normal University(Elementary Education Edition)
基金 全国教育科学规划课题"小学生学科能力测评研究"研究成果之一(CHA130164)
关键词 语文课程标准 《学科能力表现标准》 《课程与标准框架》 Chinese Curriculum Standards Subject Ability Performance Standards Curriculum and Standard Framework
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1华勒斯坦等.学科·知识·权力[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1999,131,132,149,147-148,149-150.
  • 2丁念金.课程论[M].福州:福建教育出版社,2006.
  • 3艾伦·C.奥恩斯坦,弗朗西斯·P.汉金斯.课程:基础、原理和问题[M].柯森,主译.南京:江苏教育出版社,2002:248.
  • 4Ina V.S. Mullis etc.PIRLS 2011 Assessment Framework [ M ].Amsterdam: IRA, Amsterdam,the Netherlands, 2009.
  • 5OECD. PISA 2009 Assessment Framework:Key Compe- tencies in Reading,Mathematics and Science [M].OECD: OECD publishing, 2010.
  • 6Irwin Kirsch etc. OECD. Reading for Change Perfor- mance and Engagement across Countries:Results from PISA 2000[ M ].OECD: OECD publishing, 2002.
  • 7苏军."第一名"含金量有多高--上海2009年国际学生评估项目(PISA)结果解读[N].文汇报,2010-12-19(12).
  • 8OECD. PISA2009 Results:Executive Summary[EB/OL] http ://www.oecd.org/document/61/0,3746, en_32252351_3 2235731 46567613_1_1_1_1,00.html,2010-12-12.
  • 9施良方.课程理论-课程的原理、基础与问题[M].北京:教育科学出版社,1996:3.
  • 10中国国家标准化管理委员会.学科分类与代码表(人文社科类)[S].北京:国家标准出版社,2009.1.

共引文献90

同被引文献19

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部