期刊文献+

睾丸鞘膜覆盖对减少尿道下裂再手术后尿道皮肤瘘的效果分析 被引量:5

Efficacy of tunica vaginalis as anti-fistula coverage during redo hypospadias repair
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较在尿道下裂再手术病例中睾丸鞘膜与其他软组织覆盖对防止尿道皮肤瘘的疗效影响。方法回顾性分析2010年9月至2014年4月于本院进行尿道成形和尿瘘修补治疗的尿道下裂再手术患者226例,年龄2岁1个月至34岁9个月(平均年龄9岁5个月)。95例远段尿道裂开,107例尿瘘,28例尿道狭窄,24例尿道憩室,23例残留阴茎下曲,52例为分期手术一期术后。术中未采用软组织覆盖18例,阴囊肉膜瓣覆盖46例,阴茎皮下筋膜瓣覆盖74例,邻近软组织覆盖35例,睾丸鞘膜覆盖53例。术后留置尿管5~14d,随访24~67个月。结果无软组织覆盖组中,5例出现尿瘘(27.8%),阴囊肉膜瓣覆盖组7例出现尿瘘(15.2%),阴茎皮下筋膜瓣覆盖组7例尿瘘(9.5%),以邻近软组织覆盖组4例尿瘘(11.4%),睾丸鞘膜覆盖组中2例出现尿瘘(3.8%)。运用卡方检验对各组进行比较,尿瘘发生率的差异存在统计学意义(x^2=6.978,P=0.008),各组间两两比较,睾丸鞘膜组与无软组织覆盖组间(x^2=8.589,P=0.003)、睾丸鞘膜组与阴囊肉膜组间(x^2=3.863,P=0.049),带蒂筋膜组与无组织覆盖组间(x^2=4.237,P=0.004)差异有统计学意义,其余组间差异统计学意义。结论尿道下裂治疗中应强调对成形尿道进行软组织覆盖,睾丸鞘膜较其他常用软组织能够更有效减少尿道下裂再手术后尿道皮肤瘘的发生几率。 Objetive To compare the efficacy of tunica vaginalis flap versus other soft tissues as neoure-thral coverage during redo hypospadias repair.Methods From September 201 0 through April 201 4,226 redo cases of hypospadias were treated with urethral dehiscence (n =95),urethrocutaneous fistula (n =1 07),ure-thral stenosis (n =28),urethral diverticulum (n =24),urethral tethering(n =23)and staged repair (n =52). Their average age was 1 1 3 (25 -41 7)months.According to coverings,they were divided into 5 groups,i.e. group A without coverage (n =1 8),group B with scrotal dartos flap (n =46),group C with prepucial fascia (n=74),group D with adjacent fascia (n =35)and group E with tunica vaginalis flap (n =53).A urethral stent provided urinary diversion for 5 to 1 4 days.The follow-up period was 24 to 67 months.Results In group A,5 /1 8 (27.8%)developed urethrocutaneous fistula.The incidence of fistula was 1 5.2% (7 /46),9.5%(7 /74) and 1 1 .4%(4 /35)in groups B,C and D respectively.In group E,there were significantly fewer urethrocutane-ous fistulas (2 /53,3.8%)as compared to other groups.The inter -group differences were statistically signifi-cant in fistula rate (χ2 =6.978,P =0.008).And the inter-group differences between group A & E (χ2 =8.589,P =0.003),group B &E (χ2 =3.863,P =0.049)and group A &C (χ2 =4.237,P =0.004)had statistical significances. Conclusions Tunica vaginalis flap reduces fistula rate and it is superior to other cov-erage as a waterproofing layer for preventing fistula during redo hypospadias repair.
出处 《临床小儿外科杂志》 CAS 2016年第5期433-435,446,共4页 Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery
基金 四川省卫生和计划生育委员会科研基金项目,项目编号:150206
关键词 睾丸鞘膜 尿道皮肤瘘 尿道下裂 再手术 Tunica Vaginalis Flap Urethrocutaneous Fistula Hypospadias Reoperation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Rushton H G, Belman AB. The splitprepuce in situ onlayhypospadias repair [ J ]. J Urol, 1998, 160: 1134.
  • 2Ap0sa H S. New concepts in the management of hypospadias and its complications [ J ]. Ann R Coil Surg Engl, 1998,80 : 161.
  • 3Snow BW, Cartwright PC, Unger K. Tunica vaginalis blanket wrap to prevent urethroeutaneous fistula: an 8- year experi- ence[J]. J Uro1,1995,153(2) :472-473.
  • 4吴荣德,于有德,于启海,王刚,郭宗远,季海萍.应用血管蒂筋膜覆盖——预防尿道下裂术后尿瘘的一种有效措施[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2005,26(10):517-519. 被引量:16
  • 5Belman AB. De-epithelialized skin flap coverage in hypospa- dias repair[J]. J Uro1,1988,140:1273.
  • 6Yerkes EB, Adams MC, Miller DA, et al. Use of the distal spongiosum for hypospadias repair [ J ]. J Urol, 2000, 163 : 1536-1538.
  • 7Motiwala HG. Dartos flap: An aid to urethral reconstruction [ J]. Br J Urol, 1993 ;72:260-261.
  • 8Snow BW, Cartwright PC, Unger K. Tunica vaginalis blanketwrap to prevent urethrocutaneous fistula: an 8-year experi- ence[ J]. J Urol, 1995,153 (2) :472-473.
  • 9Babu R, Hariharasudhan S. Tuniea vaginalis flap is superior to inner preputial dartos flap as a waterproofing layer for pri- mary TIP repair in midshaft hypospadias [ J ]. J Pediatr Urol, 2013,9(6 Pt A) :804-807.
  • 10Dhua AK, Aggarwal SK, Sinha S, et al. Soft tissue covers in hypospadias surgery: Is tunica vaginalis better than dartos flap? [J]. J Indian Assoe Pediatr Surg,2012,17 ( 1 ) : 16- 19.

二级参考文献20

  • 1黄澄如.尿道下裂治疗现状[J].中华小儿外科杂志,1997,18(1):1-2. 被引量:87
  • 2郭丰富 金光庭 等.带蒂阴囊纵隔皮管一期正位开口修复尿道下裂[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1996,17(2):118-118.
  • 3Chandrasekharam VV, Jayaram H. Soft tissue covers in hy- pospadias surgery:Is tunica vaginalis better than dartos flap [J]. Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg,2012,17(3) :141.
  • 4Snodgrass WT. Snodgrass technique for hypospadias repair [J]. BJU Int ,2005 ,95 : 683-693.
  • 5Thomas DT, Karadeniz Cerit K1, Yener S,et al. The effect of dorsal dartos flaps on complication rates in hypospadias re- pair : Arandomises prospective study [ J ]. Pediatr Urol,2015, 11(1) :23,1-4.
  • 6Cimador M, Pensabene M, Sergio M, et al. Coverage of ure- throplasty in pediatric hypospadias: Randomized comparison between different flaps[J]. Int J Urol,2013,20(10) : I000- 1005.
  • 7Springer A. Editorial comment to coverage of urethroplasty in pediatric hypospadias: randomized comparison betweendif- ferent flaps[J]. Int J Urol,2013,20(10) :1006.
  • 8Hayrettin Ozturk, Dartos flap coverage of the neourethra fol- lowing repair for primary hypospadias, reoperative hypospa- dias and urethrocutaneous fistulas. It is a safe approach [J]. Acta Cirfirgica Brasileira- ol. 2010,25 (2) 190- 193.
  • 9Bertozzi M1, Ylldlz A, Kamal B, et al. Multicentric ex- perience on double dartos flap protection in tubularized in- cised plate urethroplasty for distal and midpenile hypospadi- as[J]. Pediatr Surg Int,2011,27(12) :1331-1336.
  • 10Cimador MI, Pensabene iVI, Sergio M, et al. Coverage of urethroplasty in pediatric hypospadias: randomized compar- ison between different flaps[J]. Int J Urol,2013,20(10) : 1000-1005.

共引文献23

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部