期刊文献+

老年患者大肠埃希菌血流感染的临床指标应用价值及预后 被引量:1

Clinical index application value and prognosis inthe elderly patients with Ecoli blood stream infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨大肠埃希菌血流感染(Ecoli bloodstreaminfection,ESI)老年患者的临床指标价值及预后的差异。方法:回顾性分析比较2011年1月-2013年12月入住聊城市人民医院的226例老年和168例中青年ESI患者的临床资料。结果:与中青年组相比,老年组患者入住内科病区及合并呼吸道感染的比例明显增加,合并腹部外伤比例明显降低ICU入住时间≥5天、机械通气、中心静脉置管等危险因素在老年组更为常见(P〈0.05)。老年组与中青年组血糖分别为(9.0±5.0;6.6±2.3)、降钙素原(28.9±5.6;16.7±6.4)、多重病原菌血流感染(15.9%;6.5%)、APACHE Ⅱ评分(20.1±8.2;14.9±7.4)、SOFA评分(7.5±4.3;4.6±3.8),住院病死率(20.3%;4.7%)和90d病死率(18.5%;7.1%)均明显高于中青年组(P〈0.01)。结论:与中青年患者相比,老年患者ESI有其特殊的病原学特征、危险因素和抗菌药物应用特点,且患者预后较差。 Objective: To investigate the differences of clinical characteristics and prognosis between elderly patients and younger and middle-aged patients with Ecoli bloodstream infection (ESI) . Methods: The clinical information of 226 elderly patients and 168 younger and middle-aged patients with ESI in Liaocheng People's Hospital from January 2011 to June 20l 3 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Compared with younger and middle-aged patients, the elderly patients were associated with more incidence of physican clinic, respiratory tract infection and more often to undergo intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation and central venous catheterization (P〈0.05). Compared with younger and middle-aged group, elderly patients had significant higher serum glucose(9.0±5.0 vs.6.6±2.3), serum PCT(28.9±5.6 vs.16.7±6.4), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [I score (20.1± 8.2 vs.14.9±7.4), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (7.5±4.3 vs.4.6±3.8) and hospital mortality (37.2% vs.18.3%) (P〈0.01). Conclusion: Compared with younger and middle-aged group, the elderly ESI patients showed different pathogen features, risk factors, and antifungal exposure, with poorer prognosis in elderly ESI patients.
出处 《医学检验与临床》 2016年第6期32-35,共4页 Medical Laboratory Science and Clinics
关键词 大肠埃希菌 老年 预后 Ecoli Aged Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献89

  • 1文细毛,任南,吴安华,徐秀华.老年患者医院内菌血症病原菌分布与相关因素分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2004,14(17):130-133. 被引量:5
  • 2林平.老年患者医院真菌感染相关危险因素分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2006,25(4):284-285. 被引量:20
  • 3Ostrosky-zeichner L,Pappas PG.Invasive candidiasis in the intensive care unit.Crit Care Med,2006,34:851-863.
  • 4Wisplinghoff H,Bischoff T,Tallent SM,et al.Nosocomial blood-stream infections in US hospitals:analysis of 24 179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study.Clin Infect Dis,2004,39:309-317.
  • 5Tortorano A M,Caspani L,Riggoni AL,et al.Candidosis in the intensive care unit:a 20-year survey.J Hosp Infect,2004,57:8-13.
  • 6Pfaller MA,Diekema DJ,Jones RN,et al.International surveillance of blood stream infections due to candidaspecies:frequency of occurrence and in vitro susceptibilities to fluconazole,ravuconazole,And voriconazole of isolates collected from 1997through 1999 in the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program.J Clin Microbiol,2001,39:3254-3259.
  • 7Jord-Marcos R,Alvarez-Lerma F,Jurado M,et al.Risk factors for candidaemia in critically ill patients:a prospective surveillance study.Mycoses,2007,50:302-310.
  • 8Lewis RE.Overview of the changing epidemiology of candidemia.Curr Med Res Opin,2009,25:1732-1740.
  • 9Lin MY,Carmeli Y,Zumsteg J,et al.Prior antimicrobial therapy and risk for hospital-acquired Candida glabrata and Candida krusei fungemia:a case-case-control study.Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2005,49:4555-4560.
  • 10Horn DL,Neofytos D,Anaissie EJ,et al.Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 2019patients:data from the prospective antifungal therapy alliance registry.Clin Infect Dis,2009,48:1695-1703.

共引文献5998

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部