胡适与梁启超传记观之比较研究

The Comparative Study on Biography Views of HU Shi and LIANG Qichao

梁启超和胡适分别以学者身份和改革家身份进行传记研究。梁启超的传记/自传研究属于历史的研究,立足于历史,着眼于现实;胡适则属于现实的研究,立足于现实,着眼于未来。就传记/自传范畴而言,梁启超是在历史的范畴内考察,他所说的自传主要指史家自序式自传;胡适则试图在文学的范围内考察,他所说的自传已具有较广的涵盖面。此外,梁启超和胡适都找到了在体例上最类似于西方自传的作品——"自传年谱",但两人"自传年谱"的范畴和涵义却不尽相同。

LIANG Qichao researched biography as a scholar,HU Shi studied biography as a reformer.Based on history,LIANG Qichao＇s autobiography/biography research belongs to historical research and focuses on reality; based on reality,HU Shi＇s biography/autobiography research belongs to the reality and looks at the future. LIANG Qichao examined the biography/autobiography in the category of history,the autobiography he meant mainly refers to historians preface autobiography; while HU Shi is trying to examine the biography/autobiography in the scope of literature,the autobiography he meant has a very wide range of coverage. Although both of them found out a new biography style： ＂the autobiographical chronicle＂,which is most similar to the Western autobiographic works,the category and meaning they meant are not the same.