期刊文献+

拍卖、讨价还价还是固定价格?——网络交易定价机制选择的实证研究 被引量:1

Auctions, Bargaining or Posted Prices? An Empirical Study on Online Pricing Mechanism Choice
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着互联网经济高速发展,网络交易定价机制不断完善。本文对影响卖家在拍卖、固定价格与讨价还价三种机制之间进行选择的主要因素及其作用机理进行了理论探讨和实证检验。基于eBay网站二手车交易的经验数据,通过构建结构方程并利用极大似然估计法进行实证分析,结果表明,卖家交易耐心程度和交易规模对于卖家定价机制选择行为具有显著影响;三种定价机制下商品成交价格并无明显差异,但拍卖和讨价还价机制相比固定价格机制显著提升了成交概率,从而能够为卖家带来更高的期望收益。在我国电子商务和在线交易迅速发展的背景下,有必要从改善网络交易效率的视角出发,进一步丰富并完善网络交易的定价机制。 With the rapid development of Internet economy, online pricing practices improve continuously. This paper theoretically investigates and empirically tests the main factors affecting sellers’ choice among auctions, posted prices and bargaining mechanisms and the effects. Based on second-hand cars’ transaction data on eBay, this paper builds structural equation and uses maximum likelihood estimation to make an empirical study, and finds that the sellers’ patience and transaction scales have significant effects on sellers’ pricing mechanism choice;there is no obvious difference in transaction prices among these three pricing mechanisms, but compared with posted prices, auctions and bargaining significantly increase successful transaction probability, thereby bringing higher expected revenues to sellers. Under the background of rapid development of electronic commerce and online transactions in China, it is necessary to further improve and perfect the online pricing mechanism from the perspective of improving the efficiency of online transactions.
作者 韩雍 陈恭平
出处 《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第11期29-44,共16页 Foreign Economics & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71501155)
关键词 网络交易平台 拍卖 讨价还价 固定价格 卖方收益 online transaction platform auction bargaining posted price sellers’ revenue
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献18

  • 1Akerlof, G. , 1970, "The Market for 'Lemons' : Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism", Quarterly Journal of Economics 84.
  • 2Ba, S. and P.A. Pavlou, 2002, "Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behaviour", MIS Quarterly 26 : 243--268.
  • 3Dewally, M. and L.H. Ederington, 2006, "Reputation, Certification, Warranties and Information as Remedies for Seller-buyer Information Asymmetries: Lessons from the Online Comic Book Market", Journal of Business, 79(2).
  • 4Dewan, S. and V. Hsu, 2004, "Adverse Selection in Electronic Markets: Evidence from Online Stamp Auctions", Journal of Industrial Economics 52(4): 497--516.
  • 5Eaton, D.H., 2002, "Valuing Information: Evidence from Guitar Auctions on eBay', Working Paper, Murray State University.
  • 6Heckman, J., 1979, "Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error", Econometrica 47:153--161.
  • 7Hidvegi, Z., W. Wang, and A.B. Whinston, 2003, "Buy-price English Auction", Working Paper.
  • 8Houser, D. and J. Wooders, 2001, "Reputation in Auctions: Theory and Evidence from eBay", Working Paper.
  • 9Kalyanam, K. and S. McIntyre, 2001, "Return on Reputation in Online Auction Markets", Working Paper, Santa Clara University.
  • 10Klein, Daniel (ed.), 1997, Reputation, The University of Michigan Press.

共引文献152

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部