高校新型研发机构“四不像”运行机制研究

Study on the Operating Mechanism of "Four Dissimilarities" of New Research and Development Institutions in Universities

文章基于大学职能扩展论、知识网络复杂论、开放系统论和协同创新论,对高校新型研发机构运行机制进行了研究。研究发现,高科技产业的创新与发展是一项复杂的系统工程,涉及众多产业链主体族群,有效整合科技资源的运行机制至关重要。在有效整合科技资源的过程中,高校新型研发机构以其"四不像"的灵动创新特质,致力搭建高科技创新产业链上多族群沟通与合作平台,共同打造高科技创新产业的商业模式,促进高科技成果的产业化、证券化、高端化和国际化,为产业链各方提供合作的价值增值通道。"四不像"创新理论给高校新型研发机构如何设计其运行机制一个基本结论:既具有大学的属性,又不局限于大学的传统职能;既是科研机构,又区别于传统的科研机构;既有企业的市场化特质,又不将利润作为唯一的目标;既是事业单位,又具有传统事业单位不具备的灵活性和机动性。

Based on theories of functional extension in universities, complex knowledge network, open system and collaborative innovation, this paper aims at the research on operating mechanism of new research and development institutions in universities. Studies have found that innovation and development of high-tech industry is a complex systematic project , involved lots of major groups in industrial chain, for which effective integration of technological resources is of crucial importance. In the process of integration of tech-nological resources, new research and development institutions in universities, characterized by flexibly innovative ＂four dissimilarit-ies＂, dedicates to building an exchangeable and cooperative platform for major groups in industrial chain , and mutually creates a commercial pattern of high-tech innovative industry. So as to promote the industrialized, securitized, high-end orientated and interna-tional high-tech achievements, it is necessary to provide added value for the cooperation among all parties in the industrial chain. Innovative theory of ＂four dissimilarities＂ draws a basic conclusion for the new research and development institution in university , in order to design the operating mechanism： such an institution has the same property with a university but beyond traditional functions; it is a research institute different from conventional research institutes, which emphasizes more on transformation of sci-tech achievements;it is an enterprise of marketization of which profit is just one of the targets but not the only target; it is not entirely the same as a traditional public institution for its distinct flexibility and mobility.