期刊文献+

侧俯卧位三孔法胸腔镜下微创食管癌切除术的护理配合 被引量:5

The Side With the Prone Position Three Hole Method of Thoracoscopic Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy of Nursing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察侧俯卧位三孔法胸腔镜下微创食管癌切除术的护理配合效果。方法将2014年12月-2015年5月在我院接受治疗的36例食管癌患者作为研究对象,对患者采用侧俯卧位三孔法胸腔镜微创手术进行食管癌治疗,并对手术的护理配合进行观察分析。结果 36例患者手术的平均切口长度为(3.5±1.5)cm,平均出血量为(202.3±21.8)ml、平均淋巴清扫数为(26.2±7.5)个,住院时间为(7.8±2.3)d。结论在采用侧俯卧位三孔法胸腔镜进行食管癌微创手术时配合规范、细致的护理,对手术的创口、出血量、手术效果等能起到显著的促进作用,利于患者术后恢复。 Objective To observe the side effect of nursing position in minimally invasive esophagectomy with three hole method under thoracoscope. Methods From 36 cases of patients with esophageal cancer from December 2014 to May 2015 in my hospital as the research object, the patients with lateral posture three hole method of thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of esophageal cancer, and nursing to surgery combined with observation and analysis. Results The average length of incision surgery for 36 patients(3.5±1.5) cm, the average amount of bleeding was(202.3±21.8) ml, the average for all dissection(26.2±7.5), hospitalization time was(7.8±2.3) d. Conclusion Three hole thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery of esophageal carcinoma with standard of care and meticulous in the side of the stomach, surgical wound, bleeding volume, operation effect can play a significant role in promoting for patients with postoperative recovery.
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2016年第31期244-245,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 三孔法胸腔镜 微创 食管癌切除术 护理 配合 Three hole method of thoracic surgery Minimally invasive Esophageal cancer resection Nursing Coordination
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献60

  • 1李剑锋,王俊.电视胸腔镜手术的发展现状[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2001,6(2):117-119. 被引量:11
  • 2Rovers MM,Schilder AG,Zielhuis GA,Rosenfeld RM,张江平,杨妙丽,张全安.中耳炎[J].国外医学(耳鼻咽喉科学分册),2005,29(3):141-143. 被引量:435
  • 3王俊.电视胸腔镜在胸部疾病治疗中的应用现状[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(6):384-385. 被引量:82
  • 4杜贾军,孟龙,陈景寒.胸段食管癌的微创手术治疗(附145例报告)[J].山东医药,2005,45(27):9-10. 被引量:14
  • 5朱成楚,陈仕林,叶中瑞,郭剑波,叶敏华,马德华,叶加洪.电视胸腔镜下食管癌切除及疗效分析(附120例报道)[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2006,22(6):364-365. 被引量:37
  • 6Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg, 2010, 252 : 292-298.
  • 7Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 opera- tions. Ann Surg, 2008, 248: 1081-1091.
  • 8Decker G, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg, 2009, 35: 13-21.
  • 9Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, et al. Comparison of the short-term quality of life in patients with esophageal canc- er after subtotal esophageetomy via video-assisted thoraeo- scopie or open surgery. Dis Esophagus, 2010, 23 : 408- 414.
  • 10Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379 (9829) : 1887-1892.

共引文献79

同被引文献30

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部