再论康德与牟宗三圆善论的幸福指向——兼谈杨虎博士对杨泽波先生的批评

Re-discussion on the Happiness of Kant and Mou Zongsan's Theory of Perfect Good:Including An Examination of Yang Hu's "Refutation" to Yang Zebo

杨虎博士在《论康德与牟宗三圆善论的幸福指向——驳杨泽波教授》一文中,认为杨泽波先生以道德幸福与物质幸福区分牟宗三和康德的幸福指向是为错论。杨博士进一步肯定了牟宗三先生"纵贯纵讲"的立论思路,认为仁心创造的即是"物自身",从而全面否定了杨先生衡定牟先生的圆善论不能解决康德意义的幸福之结论。牟先生试图沟通儒家与康德之意图自不必多言,然牟先生用儒家的方式解决康德意义的圆善,也导致其圆善论出现了明显的理论问题。此文一则简谈牟先生与杨先生的相关立论,冀望澄清误解,二则希望我辈学人在学术探讨时能遵循基本的原则,采取合理的方式。

In the article 'On Kant and Mou Zongsan's happiness of Theory of Perfect Good:Refute Prof.Yang Zebo',Yang Hu makes his refutation on Yang Zebo's explanation of Mou Zongsan' s Theory of Perfect Good.Yang Hu holds the view that it is wrong for Yang Zebo to differ Kant and Mou Zongsan's happiness with the 'material field' and 'moral field'.He appreciates Mou Zongsan's Vertical System instead,and in that sense,Ren could create 'thing-in-itself'.As a result,Yang Zebo's explanation is totally a failure.Actually,Mou Zongsan have done great jobs in communicating Kantian Philosophy and Ruism,but his Ruist approach to solve the problem of Kant' s Perfect Good is far from satisfactory.The two main purposes of this short essay are firstly,to make some necessary clarifications on Mou Zongsan and Yang Zebo's thoughts;secondly,to advocate an appropriate attitude in academic discussion within the young generation.