期刊文献+

内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗胆总管结石1942例临床分析 被引量:2

A clinical analysis of 1942 cases with common bile duct stones treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的总结内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)治疗胆总管结石的临床特点。方法回顾性分析1942例行ERCP治疗胆总管结石的的临床资料,分为青年组(18-44岁)、中年组(45~64岁)和老年组(≥65岁),分层分析三组患者性别、基础疾病、取石结果以及术后并发症发生情况。结果基础疾病患病率随年龄增加而升高(P〈O.01),取石成功率随年龄增加而降低(P〈O.01)。老年组结石大小和胆总管直径大于青年组和中年组(P〈O.05);而三组患者性别、结石数目、合并乳头旁憩室及术后并发症无统计学差异(P〉O.05)。结论ERCP治疗不同年龄层患者胆总管结石均是有效而安全的。 Objective To summarize the clinical characteristics of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) in treating common bile duct stones. Methods The data of 1942 patients with common bile duct stones treated with ERCP were retrospectively analyzed, who were assigned into three groups of A(18-44 years old), B(45-64 years old) and C(≥65 years old). A stratification analysis of the gender, underlying diseases, stone removal results and postoperative complications were performed. Results As the age increased, the prevalence rate of comorbidities was elevated,while success rate of stone removal was decreased(P〈0. 05). The stone size and diameter of common bile duct were larger in group C than those in groups of A and B(P〈O. 01). There were no significant differences in the gender, stone number, combination with peripapillary diverticulum and postoperative complications among three groups(P〉0. 05). Conclusion The ERCP in the treatment of common bile duct stones is effective and safe in the Datients with different ages.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 2016年第21期2318-2320,共3页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词 内镜逆行胰胆管造影 胆总管结石 年龄 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Common bile duct stones Age
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献33

  • 1Masatoshi Shoji,Hiroshi Sakuma,Yutaka Yoshimitsu,Tsutomu Maeda,Masuo Nakai,Hiroshi Ueda.Topical nitrate drip infusion using cystic duct tube for retained bile duct stone:A six patients case series[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2013,5(6):210-215. 被引量:4
  • 2中华医学会糖尿病学分会代谢综合征研究协作组.中华医学会糖尿病学分会关于代谢综合征的建议[J].中国糖尿病杂志,2004,12(3):156-161. 被引量:3042
  • 3别平,周永碧.ERCP检查并发急性重症胆管炎的临床因素分析[J].内镜,1993,10(4):208-210. 被引量:5
  • 4冉瑞图,吴沙沙,卢实春,李小庆.第一胆流与第二胆流[J].四川医学,1993,14(7):399-401. 被引量:3
  • 5Anderson PJ, Critchley JA, Chan JC, et al. Factor analysis of the metabolic syndrome: obesity vs insulin resistance as the central abnormality [ J ]. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 2001, 25 (12) : 1782-1788.
  • 6Lann D, LeRoith D. Insulin resistance as the underlying cause for the metabolie syndro-me [ J ]. Med Clin North Am, 2007, 91 (6) : 1063-1077.
  • 7Barzilai N, Gupta G.. Interaction between aging and syndrome X : new insights on the pathophysiology of fat distribution [ J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1999, 892(18) :.58-72.
  • 8Ye X, Yu Z, Li H, et al. Distributions of C-reactive protein and its association with metabolic syndrome in middle-aged and older Chinese people [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 49(17): 1798-1805.
  • 9Sutken E, Inal M, Ozdemir F. Effects of vitamin E and gcmfibrozil on lipid profiles, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status in the elderly and young hyperlipidemic subjects [ J]. Saudi Med J, 2006, 27 (4) : 453459.
  • 10Tsuang W, Navaneethan U, Ruiz L, et al. Hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis: presentation and management [ J ]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2009, 104(4) : 984-991.

共引文献58

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部