期刊文献+

确立编辑修改权之审思——兼评《著作权法修订草案》对相关条款的修改 被引量:5

Legal Refl ection on the Confi rmation of Editors' Right of Alteration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《著作权法修订草案送审稿》删除《著作权法》第34条编辑修改权条款的做法有欠妥当。建议保留原有条款,确立编辑修改权。因为确立编辑修改权是权利义务对等的法理要求,是编辑工作正常进行的必然要求,同时也与编辑为出版物付出的劳动相匹配。另外,从权利边界的视角考察,编辑修改权的确立,能够从权利相对面的维度,厘清保护作品完整权的含义和边界。 Article 34 of Copyright Law of the People' s Republic of China has been deleted in Draft Amendments for Deliberation Version. This modification is not appropriate to some extent. We propose Article 34 should be retained and editors' right of alteration be defined as a statutory right. This propostion is mainly based on the following reasons. Firstly, it is entirely justifiable to recognize editors' right of alteration by law according to the principle of equality of rights and obligations. Secondly, right of alteration is a major requsite for editors' work. Thirdly, considering editors' contribution to books and essays, it is reasonable to confirm this right. Last but not least, the provision of editors' right of alteration helps to define and illustrate the connotation and extension of the right to protect the integrity of works.
作者 钱静 Qian Jing(Wuhan University Press, Wuhan, 43000)
机构地区 武汉大学出版社
出处 《出版科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期28-31,共4页 Publishing Journal
关键词 编辑修改权 著作权 著作权法 保护作品完整权 修改权 Editors' right of alteration Copyright Copyright law Right to protect the integrity of works Right of revision
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献38

  • 1李琛.被误读的“修改权”[J].中国专利与商标,2004(3):69-75. 被引量:13
  • 2雷群安.版权作品权益分配的利益平衡理论再思考[J].韶关学院学报,2004,25(5):56-58. 被引量:7
  • 3陈心歌,李克.我国计算机软件最终用户责任问题的利益平衡[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,22(1):88-92. 被引量:8
  • 4韦之.知识产权论究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2001.
  • 5Richard Stallman. Innovation and the Information Environment: Reevaluating Copyright: The Public Must Prevail, 75 Oregon Law Review, 291 -6 (1996).
  • 6Burcart, No Title to Titles: An Analysis of the Lack of Copyright Protection for Literary Titles, 32 COPYRIGHT L. SYMP. (ASCAP) 75, 102 (1986) .
  • 7Hill, Copyright Protection for Historical Research: A Defense of the Minority View, 31 COPYRIGHT L. SYMP. (ASCAP) 45, 60 -61 (1984).
  • 8Kemochan, Imperatives for Enforcing Authors' Rights, 11 COLUM. - VLA J. L. & ARTS 587 (1987).
  • 9Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, The Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information Age, 2000.
  • 10Devon Thurtle. A Proposed Quick Fix To the DMCA Overprotection Problem That Even a Content Provider Could Love...or at Least Live With, 28 Seattle Univ. L. R. 1060 (2005).

共引文献93

同被引文献39

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部