期刊文献+

论在线浏览、欣赏目的临时复制的法律保护 被引量:6

Study on Legal Protection of Temporary Reproduction of Online Browsing and Appreciating
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在线浏览、欣赏,必然要对作品、表演、录音录像制品等进行临时复制。这种临时复制行为应否纳入复制权的保护范围,国际公约并未作出强制性的规定,发达国家和发展中国家的态度也截然相反。我国的立法状况是,未将临时复制纳入复制权的保护范围,只是对权利人采取的限制他人浏览、欣赏等行为的技术措施加以保护。从本质上讲,在线浏览、欣赏目的的临时复制与传统环境下的复制行为并无区别,采取赋权+技术措施+默示许可+限制权利滥用的立法模式,不仅能使权利人的利益得到有效的保护,而且也会使制度设计更加科学、合理。 Temporary reproduction of works, performance, audio and video has to be made in order to serve the purpose of online browsing and appreciating. However, international conventions do not include mandatory regulations on whether such temporary reproduction should be protected by reproduction right. Developed and developing countries also have contradictory attitudes towards this. In China, temporary reproduction is not protected by reproduction right. The legislation only protect the technical methods that obligee adapts to restrict others' conducts of browsing and appreciating. Intrinsically, there is no difference between the temporary reproduction of online browsing, appreciating and traditional duplication. Therefore, a legislative model of "empowerment+technical methods+implied license+restricting the abuse of right" should be adapted, which would not only provide effective protection for obligee's interests, but also would make legal system more complete as well as reasonable.
作者 朱长宝
机构地区 东南大学法学院
出处 《电子知识产权》 2016年第10期79-87,共9页 Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词 浏览 欣赏 临时复制 技术措施 利益平衡 Browsing Appreciating Temporary reproduction Technical methods Balance of interests
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1李明德.欧盟“版权指令”述评[J].环球法律评论,2002,24(125):457-465. 被引量:11
  • 2朱理.临时复制是否属于著作权法意义上的复制——以国际公约为核心的规范分析[J].电子知识产权,2007(1):22-25. 被引量:17
  • 3[德]鲁道夫·冯·耶林.《为权利而斗争》.胡宝海译.梁慧星主编.《民商法论丛》(第2卷),法律出版社1994年第1版,第16页.
  • 4世界知识产权组织.保护文学和艺术作品伯尔尼公约指南[M].刘波林,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002:44.
  • 5.米哈依·菲彻尔.版权法与因特网[M].郭寿康,万勇,相靖,译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2009:155.
  • 6World Intellectual Property Organization. Basic Proposal for the Substantive Provisions of the Treaty on Certain Questions Concerning the Protection of Literary and Ar- tistic Works to Be Considered by the Diplomatic Confer- ence [R]. CRNR/DC/4 (Aug. 30, 1996). www. wipo. int/edocs/mdocs/diplconf/en/crnr_ dc/crnr_ dc_ 4. doc.
  • 7PAMELA SAMUELSON. The U. S Digital Agenda at WIPO [ J ]. Virginia Journal of International Law,1997, Vol. 37:390.
  • 8郑成思.两个新的著作权条约初探[J].著作权,1998(1):2-18.
  • 9Michelle Hugard. Lost in Transitory Duration. A Look at Cartoon Network v. CSC Holdings, Inc. and Its Im- plications for Future Copyright Infringement Cases [ J]. 43 U. C. Davis L. Rev, 2009-2010: 1526-1527.
  • 10MIHALY FICSOR. Copyright for the Digital Era: The WIPO "Internet"Treaties [J]. 21 Colum. /VLA J. L. and the Arts 197, 1997: 7-9.

共引文献19

引证文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部