期刊文献+

劳动标准与贸易和投资协定挂钩的历史演进、当代特点与未来趋势 被引量:5

The Linkage between Labor Standard and Agreements of Trade and Investment: Normative Evolvement,Current Feature and Future Trends
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从1948年的《哈瓦那宪章》及1995年的《多边投资协定》草案到当前的FTA和BIT,半个多世纪以来,与经济协定挂钩的劳动标准内容处于持续演进的过程中,并对缔约方国内的劳动立法、执法、司法和法律监督提出不同程度的要求。此类挂钩整体上将趋向严格,其与国内劳动立法、执法、司法和法律监督的互动,以及实施中需要解决的条款解释和违约损害评估等问题,值得正在与美国和欧盟谈判BIT的劳动标准条款以及将来可能加入TPP劳动章谈判的中国关注。中国有必要在把握劳动标准与经济协定挂钩的整体发展趋势的基础上,根据各经济协定谈判的具体情况和中国的承受能力,从劳动标准的范围、实施义务、组织机制、争端解决程序和救济措施等方面厘定相对有利的条款。 From draft clauses of labor standard in Havana Charter( 1948) and Multilateral Investment Agreement( 1995) to labor standard clauses in current FTA and BIT,for more than 50 years,the linkage between labor standard and agreements of trade and investment has never stopped. While to different degrees,such linkage does put requirements for contracting parties' domestic labor legislation,administration adjudication and supervision. Future linkage will be stricter on the whole. As China is negotiating labor standard under the framework of BIT with US and EU,and will possibly apply to join TPP,the interaction between labor standard in economic agreements and contracting parties' domestic labor legislation,administration,adjudication and supervision should not be omitted. Problems of clause interpretation and monetary assessment of violation should be fully considered. Based on the general trend of the linkage,it is wise for China to take the respective negotiation situation of different agreements and its own implementation ability into consideration,and design labor standard clauses that are relatively beneficial from the perspectives of application range,enforcement obligation,institution,dispute settlement procedures and implementation mechanism.
作者 郑丽珍
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期155-164,共10页 Modern Law Science
基金 2016年度福建省社科规划项目"国际法视域下外国人在华就业管理制度的重构"(FJ2016B065)
关键词 劳动标准 挂钩 自由贸易协定 双边投资协定 labor standard linkage FTA BIT
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献35

  • 1门洪华.中国软实力评估报告(上)[J].国际观察,2007(2):15-26. 被引量:110
  • 2“默多克在中央党校谈传媒产业”.《学习时报》,2003年10月20日.
  • 3J.deLiselě.China’s Approach to InternationalLaw:A Historical Perspective[J].American Society of Inter-national Law Proceedings,2000,(94):273-274.
  • 4A.Hasenclever,P.Mayer&V.Rittberger.Theo-ries of International Regimes[M].Cambridge:Cambridge U-niversity Press,1997:104- 113.
  • 5邱永峥.未来十年,中国将面临哪些挑战[N].环球时报,2009-07-24(19).
  • 6A.Anghie.Imperialism,Sovereignty and the Mak-ing of International Law[M].Cambridge:Cambridge Univer-sity Press,2004:1- 12,310-320.
  • 7A.Riles.Aspiration and Control:International Le-gal Rhetoric and the Essentialization of Culture[J].HarvardLaw Review,1993,106(3):738.
  • 8E.A.Posner&J.Yoo.International Law and theRise of China[J].Chicago Journal of International Law,2006,7(1):12.
  • 9刘国远.中国驻世贸组织大使孙振宇:“中国逐渐进入世贸组织核心圈”[N].参考消息,2008-12-25(14).
  • 10A.D.Renteln.Cultural Bias in International Law[J].American Society of International Law Proceedings,1998,(92):236-237.

共引文献29

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部