期刊文献+

体外受精/胞浆内单精子注射子代围生期结局的回顾性分析 被引量:4

The Perinatal Outcomes of Offsprings from IVF/ICSI:A Retrospective Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:回顾性分析体外受精(IVF)/胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)子代的围生期结局。方法:分析2012年1月—2013年12月在南京医科大学附属苏州医院接受辅助生殖技术(ART)治疗鲜胚和冻胚移植840个活产周期的临床资料和围生期结局。结果:双胎妊娠出生体质量([2 536.84±417.23)g vs.(3 314.67±466.56)g]和分娩孕周([36.78±1.74)周vs(.39.31±1.45)周]均低于单胎妊娠,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);双胎妊娠早产发生率(45.66%vs.3.70%)、低出生体质量儿发生率(41.32%vs.2.41%)、剖宫产率(97.26%vs.81.64%)高于单胎妊娠,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。冻胚移植单胎妊娠出生体质量([3 358.96±458.34)g vs.(3 249.11±474.28)g]和剖宫产率(85.97%vs.74.58%)高于鲜胚移植,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:IVF/ICSI技术获得的双胎妊娠较单胎妊娠不良围生期结局更多;在单胎妊娠中冻胚移植出生体质量和剖宫产率高于鲜胚移植。 Objective: Methodsclinical data and perinatal outcomes of 840 cycles of fresh embryo transfer or frozen-thawed embryo transfer(FET) were retrospectively analyzed in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2013. Results: The birth weight [(2 536.84±417.23)g vs.(3 314.67±466.56)g] and the gestational age[(36.78±1.74)week vs.(39.31±1.45) week] of the twins were significantly lower than singletons (P〈0.05). The rates of premature birth (45.66% vs. 3.70%), low birth weight(41.32% vs. 2.41%) and cesarean section(97.26% vs. 81.64%) in the twins were significantly higher than the singletons(P〈0.05). The birth weight[(3 358.96±458.34)g vs. (3 249.11 ±474.28)g] and the cesarean section (85.97% vs. 74.58%)in the singletons of FET group were significantly higher than those in the fresh embryo transfer group (P〈0.05). Conclusions: The twins of ART have more adverse perinatal outcomes than the singletons. The singletons of FET have better outcomes than the singletons of fresh embryo transfer.
作者 钱春凤 李红
出处 《国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志》 CAS 2016年第6期459-462,共4页 Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning
关键词 生殖技术 辅助 双生 妊娠结局 早产 婴儿 出生时低体重 性别比率 Reproductive techniques, assisted Twins Pregnancy outcome Premature birth Infant, low birth weight Sex ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1Kjellberg AT,Carlsson P,Bergh C.Randomized single versus double embryo transfer:obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis[J].Hum Reprod,2006,21 (1):210-216.
  • 2Fiddelers AA, Severens JL, Dirksen CD, et al.Economic evaluations of single-versus double-embryo transfer in IVF[J].Hum Reprod Update,2007,13(1):5-13.
  • 3ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law.Ethical issues related to multiple pregnancies in medically assisted procreation [J].Hum Reprod,2003,18 (9):1976-1979.
  • 4Thurin A,Hausken J,Hillensj T,et al.Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization[J].N Engl J Med,2004,351(23):2392-2402.
  • 5Lukassen HG,Braat DD,Wetzels AM,et al.Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer:a randomized controlled trial[J].Hum Reprod,2005,20 (3):702-708.
  • 6Gardner DK,Lane M,Stevens J,et al.Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome:towards a single blastocyst transfer[J].Fertil Steril,2000,73 (6):1155-1158.
  • 7Hamilton M.Multiple births in the United Kingdom-a consensus statement[J].Hum Fertil(Camb),2007,10(2):71-74.
  • 8Gleicher N,Barad D.The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer[J].Hum Reprod,2006,21(6):1337-1344.
  • 9Papanikolaou EG,Camus M,Kolibianakis EM,et al.In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavagestage embryos[J].N Engl J Med,2006,354(11):1139-1146.
  • 10Gardner DK,Vella P,Lane M,et al.Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers[J].Fertil Steril,1998,69(1):84-88.

共引文献15

同被引文献16

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部