期刊文献+

多种临床标本微生物检验阳性率结果的比较分析 被引量:35

Comparative analysis on positive rate results of microbial test in multiple clinical samples
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析多种临床标本微生物检验的阳性率及其影响因素,提高临床检验水平。方法参照微生物标本检验的相关要求和标准进行检测,严格控制检测质量,以提高检测结果的准确性。结果 2015年血液标本、呼吸道标本及尿液标本的阳性率高于2014年,其阳性率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2个时间段痰液标本阳性率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);影响标本阳性率的因素包括标本采集不规范、标本运送与接收不规范及检验医师技术水平问题等。结论不同时间段的临床标本,其微生物检验的阳性率不同。通过对比分析,找出其影响因素并提出相应的改进措施,可提高临床检验水平。 Objective To analyze the positive rates of the microbial test in multiple clinical specimens and their influencing factors in order to improve the level of clinical testing.Methods According to the relevant requirements and standards of microbial specimen inspection,the test quality was strictly controlled in order to improve the accuracy of detection results.Results The positive rates of blood,respiratory tract and urine specimens in 2015 were higher than that in 2014,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05);the positive rate difference of sputum specimens had no statistical difference between these two time periods(P〈0.05).The factors influencing the positive rate of the specimens included the non-standard specimen collection,non-standard specimen transporting,non-standard specimen receiving,laboratory physician′s technical level,etc.Conclusion The clinical specimens at different time periods have different positive rate of microbial test.Finding the influencing factors by the comparative analysis and proposing the corresponding improvement measures can increase the level of clinical laboratory detections.
出处 《国际检验医学杂志》 CAS 2016年第22期3126-3127,3131,共3页 International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 临床标本 微生物检验 阳性率 clinical specimens microbiological examination the positive rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献46

  • 1连金泉.回顾性分析比较不同临床标本微生物检验的阳性率[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(21):336-337. 被引量:1
  • 2董毅娟.不同时间段临床标本微生物检验的阳性率分析[J].大家健康,2012,6(10):13-14.
  • 3Jaing C,Gardner S,McLoughlin K,et al. A functional gene array for detection of bacterial virulence elements [J]. PLoS ONE, 2008,3 (5) :e2163.
  • 4Etienne Carbonnelle,C6cile Mesquitaa,Emmanuelle Bille. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry tools for bacterial identi fication in clinical microbiology laboratory[J]. Clinical Bio- chemistry, 2011,44( 1 ) : 104-109.
  • 5姜良飞.回顾性分析比较不同临床标本微生物检验的阳性率[J].健康必读(中旬刊),2013,12(8):146-146.
  • 6许晓红.回顾性分析比较不同临床标本微生物检验的阳性率[J].健康必读(中旬刊),2013,12(7):102-102.
  • 7C, Guillet-Caruba V, Martinez F,et al.The new tools of mi- crobiological diagnosis of tuberculosis [ J ].M6decine Interne , 2014,35(12) :794N 800.
  • 8Christoffersen S.The importance of microbiological testing for establishing cause of death in 42 forensic autopsies [ J ]. Fo-rensic Sei Int, 2015,28 (250) : 27 - 32.
  • 9Jes6s, Guinea Emilio, Bouza,et al.Current challenges in the microbiological diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis [ J ]. Myco- pathologia,2014,178(5) :403- 406.
  • 10王雪文,顾克菊,陶建敏.微生物标本采集中的存在问题及干预对策[J].上海护理,2009,9(1):47-48. 被引量:27

共引文献110

同被引文献180

引证文献35

二级引证文献100

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部