摘要
目的比较患者自行完成的膀胱过度活动症症状评分(OABSS)和根据3日排尿日记得出的膀胱过度活动症症状评分(OABSS-BD)的比较,确认以患者主诉为参考依据的OABSS是否能准确反应患者的实际状态。方法对纳入研究的67例男性和45例女性病例进行OABSS评估并记录3日以上排尿日记,根据患者3日排尿日记完成OABSS-BD评分,比较两个评分结果是否有差异。结果女性患者白天排尿次数、夜尿次数OABSS得分(0.96±0.56、2.13±0.66)明显高于OABSS-BD得分(0.69±0.56、1.84±0.52),和全体患者的结果相同,在全体患者中,白天排尿次数、夜尿次数OABSS得分(1.13±0.59、2.38±0.69)明显高于OABSS-BD得分(0.91±0.64、2.10±0.68)。在男性患者,夜尿次数OABSS得分(2.50±0.66)明显高于OABSS-BD得分(2.27±0.73)。结论 OABSS是评价膀胱过度活动症患者症状有效、易行的方法,但和患者排尿日记相关评估分数相比,患者本人存在过度评估白天及夜间排尿次数的情况。
Objective To explore whether the patient-determined overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) could re- fleet the actual status of patients by comparing the OABSS and OABSS derived from a 3-day bladder diary (BD). Methods A total of 67 males and 45 females included were asked to complete OABSS and record a 3-day BD. The OABSS-BD was created according to the 3-day BD. The scores were then compared. Results In females, the scores of OABSS in daytime frequency and nighttime frequency were (0.96±0.56) and (2.13±0.66), which were higher than OABSS-BD scores [(0. 69±0.56) and (1.8±0.52)]. In all patients, scores of OABSS in daytime frequency and nighttime frequency were (1.13±0.59) and (2.38±0.69), which were significantly higher than the scores of OABSS-BD [(0.91±0.64), and (2.10±0.68)]. In male patients, the score of OABSS in nighttime frequency was (2.50~0.66), which was significantly higher than score of OABSS-BD [(2.27 ±0.73)]. Conclusions OABSS is a useful and simple tool to evaluate OAB. However, patients may overestimate the day- time and nighttime frequency compared with the scores created by 3-day BD.
出处
《现代泌尿外科杂志》
CAS
2016年第11期825-827,共3页
Journal of Modern Urology
基金
国家自然科学基金(No.81101922)
深圳市科技研发资金知识创新计划基础研究项目(No.JCYJ20130402114702124
No.JCYJ20150403091443304
No.JCYJ20150403091443329)
广东省重点医学专科经费(No.2015)
关键词
膀胱过度活动症
膀胱过度活动症症状评分
排尿日记
下尿路症状
尿急
overactive bladder
overactive bladder symptom score
bladder diary
lower urinary tract symptoms
urinary ur- gency