人文社会科学的可能:方法还是反方法?

The Possibility of Humanities and Social Sciences:Method or Anti-method?

当代人的方法与近代人的方法毕竟有新旧之别,前者主要是由海德格尔、德里达等人对所谓解释学概念的改造所指明的道路,解释学不是一种方法学说,后者按照人们通常的说法是所谓笛卡尔主义。笛卡尔主义的基本面相则是致力于发现一种方法;在以这样的方式讨论方法学说演变的时候,我们感觉到,当代人的方法与近代人的方法之别,就是包含在例如自然与文化这个对子中的"方法与反方法"的对立。

The contemporary and modem methods, after all, have the difference between the new and old way. The former is mainly the way opened by Heidegger, Derrida and other thinkers through reforming the so-called concepts of hermeneutics, namely, the hermeneutics is not a theory of method. The latter, in accordance with the general speaking, is the so-called Cartesianism, the fundamental tendency of which is to focus on seeking a kind of method. When discussing the evolution of methodology in this way, we find that the difference between the contemporary method and the modem one is exactly the antilogous of ＂method and anti-method＂ , which is contained in the antithetical couplet of nature and culture as an example.