期刊文献+

论红军龙街渡“实渡”与“佯渡”的辩证关系及时代意义

On the Dialectical Relation between the “Real Crossing”and “Simulation Crossing”at Longjie Ferry of the Red Army and its Significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1935年5月3日至5日,红一军团长征到达云南元谋县龙街渡,展开了强渡金沙江之行动。对于这次渡江行动,一般的观点是"佯渡"。笔者实地考察后发现,在龙街渡上游石花滩的渡江行动是"实渡"与"佯渡"相结合的高超军事行动,并非一次单纯的"佯渡"。此次渡江可分为前后两个阶段,前段是"实渡",后段是"佯渡"。在实地考察的基础上说明了后人忽视"实渡",强化"佯渡"的主客观原因,论证了"实渡"与"佯渡"的转化和他们之间的辩证统一关系,揭示了石花滩渡江行动对于全体红军从皎平渡渡过金沙江的价值和意义。 In 1935, the Red Army was in the course of the Long March. Between May 3 and May 5, Army A arrived at Longjie Ferry, Yuanmou County, Yunnan Province and crossed the Jinsha River (upper reaches of the Yangtze River) by force. The operation is generally classified as a "simulation crossing. " Based on his personal field investigation, the author contends that it was in fact a fancy operation between a "real crossing" and a "simulation crossing" instead of a pure simulation one. This crossing was carried out in two phases, the first being "real" and the second, "simulation. " Using his findings from the field investigation, the author 1 ) explains both the subjective and objective reasons why the "real crossing" is overlooked while the "simulation crossing" highlighted; 2) demonstrates how the "real crossing" turned into a "simulation crossing" and the dialectical relation between the two crossing operations ; and 3 ) reveals the value and significance of the cross- ing operation at Shihua Tang to the major crossing operation of the whole Red Army at Jiaoping Ferry.
作者 王锡林
出处 《楚雄师范学院学报》 2016年第10期96-102,共7页 Journal of Chuxiong Normal University
基金 2015年度国家社科基金项目"西南边疆构筑各民族共有精神家园研究" 项目编号:15XKS034
关键词 红一军团 龙街渡 石花滩 “实渡”与“佯渡” Red Army A Longjie Ferry Shihua Tan "real crossing" and "simulation crossing"
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部