期刊文献+

6σ标准管理对临床生化检验质量的影响 被引量:4

Effect of Six Sigma Management on the Quality of Clinical Biochemistry Examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究6σ标准管理制度(Six Sigma quality management system)对临床生化检验质量的影响效果。方法选取2015年5月至2016年5月我院就诊的2100例患者作为研究对象,以2015年12月为节点将所有患者分为对照组(常规管理制度)及观察组(6σ标准管理制度)各1050例,在抽取其空腹静脉血并做血清分离后进行临床生化检验,对比两种管理制度下临床生化检验质量。结果对照组标本合格σ值3.48、21项目平均σ值3.22、临床反馈σ值3.05、患者抱怨σ值6.15,观察组各项σ值分别为6.05、8.02、6.10、4.55,临床生化检验质量得到了显著提升。结论 6σ标准管理制度的实施显著提升了临床生化检验质量,可以作为目前持续质量改进的优选方法,值得在今后临床检验工作中推广使用。 Objective To explore the effect of Six Sigma quality management system on the quality of clinical biochemistry examination. Methods 2,100 patients treated in Fenghua Hospital from May 2015 to May 2016 were randomly divided into control group(regular quality management system) and experimental group(Six Sigma quality management system), with 1050 patients in each group. The fasting venous blood was drawn and centrifuged for clinical biochemistry examination. The quality of clinical biochemistry examination was compared between the two groups. Results In the control group, the sigma-level of defect rate, the average value for 21 items, critical value and patient complaint rate were 3.48, 3.22, 3.05, and 6.15 respectively, while the sigma-level of each value in the experimental group were 6.05, 8.02, 6.10 and 4.55 respectively with significant improvement. Conclusion Six Sigma quality management system could significantly improve the quality of clinical biochemistry examination. As the preferred method for the continuous quality improvement, it was worth the popularization and use in clinical laboratory work in the future.
作者 张家祝
机构地区 奉化市人民医院
出处 《医院管理论坛》 2016年第10期50-52,共3页 Hospital Management Forum
关键词 6σ标准管理制度 临床 生化检验质量 Six Sigma quality management system Clinical Quality of biochemistry examination
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献65

  • 1李萍,刘小娟,徐克和,黄志刚.利用Westgard标准决定图判定测定方法性能[J].临床检验杂志,2006,24(1):69-70. 被引量:27
  • 2陈文祥,申子瑜,杨振华.临床检验分析质量指标的设定[J].中华检验医学杂志,2006,29(4):298-300. 被引量:51
  • 3张秀明,郑松柏,孙蕾,柯培锋,马骥,张文,林莲英.应用Westgard方法评价决定图判断生化检测系统性能的可接受性[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(1):86-90. 被引量:73
  • 4李园园,李萍,黄亨建.应用六西格玛理论评价临床实验室检验性能及设计质控方案[J].中国医疗器械信息,2007,13(6):9-11. 被引量:36
  • 5Westgard JO,Westgard SA. The quality of laboratory testing to- day:an assessment of metrics for analytic quality using perform- ance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2006,125 (3) : 343-354.
  • 6Coskun A. Six sigma and calculated laboratory tests[J]. Clin Chem,2006,52(4):770-771.
  • 7Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, et al. Evaluating laboratory per- formance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Meal,2000.124(4):516-519.
  • 8Westgard JO. Six sigma quality design and control[M]. 2nd ed. Madison : Westgard QC, 2006:157-184.
  • 9蔡会欣,曹永献,曹辉彩.6R质量管理模式在医学检验质量管理体系中的应用[J].河北医学,2009,31(19):2650-2651.
  • 10Westgard JO, Groth T. A predictive value model for quality control: effects of the prevalence of errors on the performance of control procedures[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 1983,80(1):49-56.

共引文献66

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部