期刊文献+

论我国刑事司法职权配置下侦查权的定位——以“刑事错案”问题为出发点 被引量:3

The Discussion on the Position of Power of Investigation under the Allocation of Criminal Judicial Authority——Taking the “Criminal Misjudged Cases” as the Starting Point
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国刑事错案中侦查权行使问题突出,主要表现为侦查权在刑事诉讼模式转化下的滞后性、侦查权与公安机关治安管理权的混淆定位以及侦查权与犯罪嫌疑人权利"对立化"等问题。相比于国外侦查权设置,我国具有侦查主体唯一性、侦查中立要求性以及公安机关与人民检察院分别独立行使侦查权等特征,结合我国《宪法》与《刑事诉讼法》的规定,应当将我国刑事司法职权之间的关系进行"菱形"定位,对"下三角"中的侦查权以多元化主体进行监督。 The problem of operation of power of investigation appears most obvious in the criminal misjudged cases, whose essence embodies the problems of the hysteresis under the mode of combating crime, confused location between the power of investigation and administrative authority of the public security organ, and the autagonism'between the power of investigation and the criminal suspect's rights. Compared with the allocation of power of investigation overseas, China has the characteristics of the uniqueness of investigation subject, the neutrality of investigation demand and the public security organ and the people's procuratorate independently use the power of investigation. And China need to locate the criminal judicial authority as the diamond'under the regulations of 〈 The Constitution 〉 and 〈 The Law of Criminal Procedure 〉 , and offer the diversified supervision to the power of investigation.
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期182-189,共8页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 侦查权 定位 刑事司法 中立性 power of investigation location criminal justice neutrality
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献245

共引文献938

同被引文献86

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部