期刊文献+

国际航空运输事故承运人先行付款制度研究——以1999年《蒙特利尔公约》第28条为分析文本 被引量:5

Study on Carriers Advance Payment System of International Air Transport Accident Commenting
原文传递
导出
摘要 先行付款制度是统一国际航空运输事故承运人责任规则的新成果,是国际航空立法人本化的体现,具有先进性和前瞻性,对保护空难受害人权益具有积极意义。该制度虽是一个理想法律构架,但具有软法性质,在理解和适用中仍存困惑和模糊之处,其具体执行和实施因国别或地区不同而差异较大,出现破坏公约统一价值和目标的端倪。为落实和履行国际义务,保护受害人权益,我国在修订《民用航空法》时应原则性地规定这一内容,然后在部门规章中丰富先行付款的条件、范围、限额、期限以及违反该义务时的制裁措施等具体规则,使其装上"牙齿",以实现上位法与下位法的协调与统一,便于操作与执行。 Advance payment is an innovation of unifying the carrier' s liability on international air transport accident. This advanced and forward - looking system is a reflection for humanitarian development of international aviation legislations and has certain positive effects on protecting consumer' s interests on air disaster. Although it is an ideal legal frame, it still has a characteristic of soft law and exists some confusing problems when carried out in practice. Actually, its specific implementation and enforcement depends on carrier's domestic laws and has big differences based on different countries and areas' legislations. Consequently, it appears the trend of destroying the uniform value and goal of convention. In order to carry out obligations of convention and protect consumer' s interests, China should generally stipulate this content in the Civil Aviation Law of P. R. C and then specifically enrich specific rules on condition, scope, amount, duration and sanctions when violated this obligations, etc, in the relevant regulations to harmonize and unify upper and lower laws, and benefit the application and implementation.
作者 张超汉
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期190-198,共9页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 2013年国家社科基金青年项目(13CFX118)"国际航空货物运输法律问题研究" 西北政法大学国际法学科青年学术创新团队科研成果
关键词 《蒙特利尔公约》 航空事故 先行付款 损害赔偿 Montreal Convention aviation accident advance payment damage compensation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献46

  • 1Soreing v. UK ,1989, 11 ECHR 439, also in Martin Dixon & Robert McCorquodale ,eds.,, CasesMaterials on International Law, Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 288.
  • 2《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》,第7条.
  • 3《禁止酷刑和其他残忍、不人道或有辱人格的待遇或处罚公约》,第3条.
  • 4《欧洲人权公约》,第3条.
  • 5《美洲人权公约》,第5条.
  • 6冯洁菡.《全球公共健康危机与,TRIPS协定与公共健康多哈宣言>》,载曾令良,主编.《21世纪初的国际法与中国》,武汉大学出版社,2005年,第198—215页.
  • 7http: //www. wto. org/english/news_ e/pres03 _ e/pr350_ e. htm.
  • 8http: //www. wto. org/english/news_ e/pres05 _ e/pr426 _ e. htm.
  • 9李雪平.《WTO与劳工权益保护》,载曾令良,主编.《21世纪初的国际法与中国》,第286页.
  • 10Quoted in Stiglitz, A Fair Deal for the World: A Review of George Soros' On Globalization, New York Review of Books, May 23, 2002, at www. nybooks, com/aritcles/15403.

共引文献166

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部