金融纠纷诉讼调解机制运行的影响因素及其实证分析--以上海为研究对象

Empirical Research on the Contributing Factors to the Litigation Mediation Mechanism in Resolving Financial Disputes:A Case Study of Shanghai

上海市金融纠纷诉讼调解实践目前面临的主要困境是:一方面,公权力机关大力强调调解方式的全面贯彻与运用,对其解纷效果抱以很高期待;另一方面,诉讼调解的现实功用较为有限。本文主要对影响当事人选用诉讼调解方式的主要影响因素进行实证研究,进而破解上述困境。就金融纠纷诉讼调解制度而言,法官对诉讼调解方式的控制力、初创企业对诉讼调解方式的偏好是促进诉讼调解方式发展的因素;解纷市场主体总体上对诉讼调解方式的不偏好是诉讼调解方式难以得到广泛运用的根本性制约因素。因此,解决上述困境的路径是限制法官对诉讼调解方式的控制力,发掘解纷市场主体对解纷方式的需求,根据解纷市场主体对解纷方式的真实需求发展和完善诉讼调解制度。

The dilemma at present exists in relation to the litigation mediation mechanisms in resolving financial disputes in Shanghai. On the one hand, there is a high expectation for the use of litigation mediation mechanisms. On the other hand, the utility of such mechanisms is limited. This article, through the empirical study, tries to find out the influencing factors contributing to this dilemma. The judges＇ controlling force over the litigation mediation process and the start-up firms＇ preference to litigation mediation are the key promoting factors to the use of such mechanisms. The lack of interest in relying on such mechanisms in resolving financial disputes is the decisive factor that blocks such mechanisms from further development. The empirical study shows us the importance of relying on the disputing parties＇ true demand in improving the utility of various litigation mediation schemes. Thus, in the future, in order to promote the development of litigation mediation mechanisms in the financial sector, we should actively explore the disputing parties＇ need of dispute resolution mechanisms on the one hand, and confine judges＇ influences over the litigation mediation process within a reasonable scope on the other hand.