摘要
《资本论》是马克思主义发展史上具有里程碑意义的著作。国外学者自《资本论》问世以来便展开了对它的研读,而以奥尔曼为代表的"内在关系哲学"批判方法的解构、以柯西克为代表的"具体辩证法"的解构和以广松涉为代表的"物象化论"的解构又是最具特色的三种学术视野。通过比较三人的研读成果的得与失,启发着我们既要科学地理解《资本论》中的方法——唯物史观、抽象力与生产方式的主导分析法,又要在《资本论》研究中处理好"继承"与"发展""、支持"与"反对""、学好"与"用好"的关系。虽然时代变化了,但《资本论》依旧"在场"。我们应该更加深入而持续地展开对这一经典文本的研读。
＂Capital＂ is the landmark work in the development process of Marxism. Scholars abroad have done lots of re- searches on it since its publication. Among those researches, deconstruction of ＂ Inner relationship philosophy＂ criticism method represented by Allman, deconstruction of ＂Specific dialects＂ represented by Chozick and deconstruction of ＂Object of evolution＂ represented by Wataru Hiromastu are the most distinctive academic visions. Through comparing gains and losings of their explo- rations, this paper points out that we should scientifically understand methods mentioned in ＂Capital＂, which is the dominant analysis combined historical materialism, abstract force and the mode of production. Besides, we should properly deal with the re- lationships between ＂Inherit＂ ＆ ＂Development＂, ＂Support＂ ＆ ＂Oppose＂ and ＂Study＂ ＆ ＂Application＂. Although time goes fast, ＂Capital＂ is still on the scene. We should go deeper continuously in the further research on this classical text.
作者
胡岳岷
付文军
Uu Yue-min Fu Wen-jun(School of Public Administration, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, Jilin, 130117 School of Marxism, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, Hubei, 430073)
出处
《经济学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第12期85-94,共10页
Economist
关键词
《资本论》
研读
学术视野
比较与启迪
＂Capital＂
Research
Academic vision
Comparison and Enlightenment
