期刊文献+

电子诉讼制度构建的法律基础 被引量:143

Legal Basis of Construction of the Electronic Litigation System
原文传递
导出
摘要 电子诉讼的发展经历了内部电子法院与电子诉讼(外部电子法院)两个阶段。在法本质上,电子诉讼中信息通讯技术的工具性虽然能够满足司法实用主义的需求,但不应在根本上改变诉讼的价值与结构。在立法论上,立法与法律解释构成了电子诉讼制度构建的两个进路,法律解释方法有利于兼顾诉讼法的完整性与开放性,立法路径则要求妥善处理诉讼原则与技术应用之间的关系。在功能论视角,电子诉讼的发展应在诉讼阶段细分的基础上引入相应技术措施,适应不同的程序保障需要;对小额诉讼程序和督促程序则可试行全程化电子诉讼。在技术保障层面,电子法律交往需要法律上的安全性及真实性保障,应通过立法明确技术规制的方法与限度。 Electronic litigation has experienced two stages of development: internal e-court and exter- nal e-court. Although the instrumental function of electronic litigation has met the demand of judicial pragmatism and is conducive to solving the problems of formalization and non-popularization resulting from traditional judicial professionalization, it is not the reason to fundamentally change the value and structure of litigation. The scope of its application is also determined the degree of importance of liti- gation rights, the nature of a case, as well as the choice made by the parties to the case. From the legislative perspective, the construction of electronic litigation system can be achieved through two ap- proaches, i.e. , legal interpretation and legislation. The former is beneficial to the development of a system that attaches equal importance to both the integrity and the openness of procedure, whereas the latter requires us to properly handle the relationship between principles of litigation and technological application, take into consideration the demand for democratization of legislation, and embody the spirit of electronic inclusiveness and electronic democracy. From the functional perspective, the ap- plication of electronic litigation depends on the principles and the structure of litigation. It is difficult to apply electronic litigation procedure to matters that require strict safeguards and those for which it is difficult to initiate error-correction procedure. Therefore appropriate ICT measures should be intro- duced into different stages of litigation in light of their different characteristics, so as to meet different rights protection needs. Pilot electronic litigation can be applied to the entire process of small claims procedure and payment order procedure. At the technical support level, in the construction of elec- tronic litigation system, China should pay attention to safety and construction of friendly infrastruc- ture, and adopt corresponding safety technological standards.
作者 王福华
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期88-106,共19页 Chinese Journal of Law
关键词 电子诉讼 电子法院 电子法律交往 电子送达 电子提交 electronic litigation, e-court, electronic communication in legal proceedings, e-service,electronic submission
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献74

  • 1Vgl. Prtltting, Der Zivilprozess im Jahre 2030 : Ein Prozess ohne Zukunft? AnwB1 2013, 401, 404 ; Gaier, Der moderne liberale Zivilprozess, NJW 2013, 2871, 2873.
  • 2Hoeren, Vision der E-Justiz, in: Technologies de 1' information et de la communication (tic) au service de la justice au XXIe si~cle, 2013, 123, 124.
  • 3Gesetz zur Intensivierung des Einsatzes von Videokonferenzteehnik in gerichtlichen und staatsanwaltschaftliehen Verfahr- en, BGB1. I 2013, S. 935.
  • 4Gesetz zur Reform der Sachaufklarung in der Zwangsvollstreckung, BGB1. I S. 2258 (Nr. 48).
  • 5德国2015年司法统计年鉴(Rechtspflege,Fachserie10,Reihe2.1),访问网址:https://www.destatis.de/DE/zahlenFakten/CesellschafI-Staat/Rechtspflege/Gerichtsverfahren/Gerichtsverfahren.html,访问日期:2016年1月14日.
  • 6BGB1. I 2005, S. 837; BGB1. I 2006, S. 3416.
  • 7Vgl. Hoeren (Fn.2) , 123, 124.
  • 8Bernhardt, Die deutsche Justiz im digitalen Zeitalter, NJW 2015, 2775, 2779.
  • 9BT-Dr. 17/12634, S. 1, 20.
  • 10Vgl. Pukall/Kiegling, Der Zivilprozess in der Praxis, Nomos, 7. Aufl. , 2013, Rn. 55 ; Bernhardt, NJW 2015, 2775.

共引文献48

同被引文献1096

引证文献143

二级引证文献576

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部