中医气论研究的“外史”转向

Transformation of “informal history” in TCM Qi Theory

过去对气内涵的争论导致其"两义说"为学界的主流认识,继而又借助西医研究方法通过实验证实其实质,结果却并未带来中医的现代化,反而导致中医理论的异化。基于此并应医学史研究趋势转变以及气的特殊属性,应对其进行"内史"与"外史"结合研究。本文试就其"外史"转向,着重从"天人本于一"的宇宙模式、"见病更见人"的人本精神与"心则超乎物法"的悟性思维三个维度进行探讨,对中医气论进行多角度解读和诠释。

In the past years,the arguments over Qi＇s connotation led to the emergence of ＂bilateral meanings theory＂which is known as the main stream in the TCM academicals. Thereafter,great efforts were made to find its essence by means of modern western medicine lab tests. Despite the great efforts,instead of the modernization of TCM,theories of TCM have been trapped into chaos and danger. This is the very reason why the paper suggests a combination approach to TCM study that involves＂the formal history＂and＂the informal history＂which emphasize three basic levels such as＂nature to human pattern＂,＂patient to disease pattern＂,＂mental condition to material pattern＂.