期刊文献+

In-stent Anchoring Facilitating Side-branch Balloon Delivery for Final Kissing: A Prospective, Single-center Registry Study

In-stent Anchoring Facilitating Side-branch Balloon Delivery for Final Kissing: A Prospective, Single-center Registry Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background:Recrossing the compromised side branch (SB) with a balloon is sometimes technically challenging.The aim of this study was to evaluate whether in-stent anchoring (ISA) is safe and effective to facilitate SB balloon delivery for final kissing.Methods:One hundred and fifty-nine consecutive patients were included (166 bifurcation lesions) in this prospective,single-center registry.ISA was used as a bailout method after unsuccessful SB crossing using conventional techniques,including low-profile balloons.Technique success was defined as SB balloon delivery and final kissing.Results:Kissing-balloon delivery was successfully performed with conventional strategies in 149 of 166 lesions (89.8%).In the remaining 17 lesions (10.2%),recrossing of the main vessel stent strut was not successful;therefore,ISA was attempted.The balloon successfully crossed the stent struts,and final kissing was achieved in 15 of 17 lesions (88.2%).Total final kissing was achieved in 164 of 166 lesions (98.8%),with success rates of 100% in the single-stent group and 97.6% in the two-stent group.Two cases without balloon delivery had complex bifurcation lesions with severe calcification.There was no vessel dissection in the anchoring zone.Conclusions:ISA is safe and effective for recrossing stent struts when conventional low-profile balloons have failed.However,large-scale trials are warranted for further evaluation. Background:Recrossing the compromised side branch (SB) with a balloon is sometimes technically challenging.The aim of this study was to evaluate whether in-stent anchoring (ISA) is safe and effective to facilitate SB balloon delivery for final kissing.Methods:One hundred and fifty-nine consecutive patients were included (166 bifurcation lesions) in this prospective,single-center registry.ISA was used as a bailout method after unsuccessful SB crossing using conventional techniques,including low-profile balloons.Technique success was defined as SB balloon delivery and final kissing.Results:Kissing-balloon delivery was successfully performed with conventional strategies in 149 of 166 lesions (89.8%).In the remaining 17 lesions (10.2%),recrossing of the main vessel stent strut was not successful;therefore,ISA was attempted.The balloon successfully crossed the stent struts,and final kissing was achieved in 15 of 17 lesions (88.2%).Total final kissing was achieved in 164 of 166 lesions (98.8%),with success rates of 100% in the single-stent group and 97.6% in the two-stent group.Two cases without balloon delivery had complex bifurcation lesions with severe calcification.There was no vessel dissection in the anchoring zone.Conclusions:ISA is safe and effective for recrossing stent struts when conventional low-profile balloons have failed.However,large-scale trials are warranted for further evaluation.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第22期2666-2669,共4页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Bifurcation In-stent Anchoring Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Bifurcation In-stent Anchoring Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献54

  • 1CHEN Shao-liang,YE Fei,ZHANG Jun-jie,ZHU Zhong-sheng,LIN Song,SHAN Shou-jie,LIU Zhi-zhong,LIU Yan,DUAN Bao-xiang,GE Jun-bo.DK crush technique: modified treatment of bifurcation lesions in coronary artery[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2005(20):1746-1750. 被引量:35
  • 2Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E, Ge L, Sangiorgi GM, Stankovic G, et aL Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA 2005,293:2126-30.
  • 3Latib A, Colombo A. Bifurcation disease: What do we know, what should we do? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008, 1:218-26.
  • 4Hildick-Smith D, de Belder A J, Cooter N, Curzen NP, Clayton TC, Oldroyd KG, et al. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: The British Bifurcation Coronary Study: Old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation 2010,121:1235-43.
  • 5Colombo A, Bramucci E, Sacch S, Violini R, Lettieri C, Zanini R, et al. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study. Circulation 2009, 119:71-8.
  • 6Ferenc M, Gick M, Kienzle RP, Bestehorn HP, Werner KD, Comberg T, et al. Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions. Eur Heart J 2008,29:2859-67.
  • 7Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, Erglis A, Kumsars I, Narbute I, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: The Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation 2006, 114:1955-61.
  • 8Hayashi S, Tohyama S, Shindo T, Fukui K, Shiba K, Nakao M, et al. Risk of side branch occlusion after coronary Palmaz-Schatz stenting. J Cardiol 1997,29:261-6.
  • 9Aliabadi D, Tilli FV, Bowers TR, Benzuly KH, Safian RD, Goldstein JA, et al. Incidence and angiographic predictors of side branch occlusion following high-pressure intracoronary stenting. Am J Cardiol 1997,80:994-7.
  • 10Kralev S, Poerner TC, Basorth D, Lang S, Wolpert C, Haghi D, et al. Side branch occlusion after coronary stent implantation in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Clinical impact and angiographic predictors. Am Heart J 2006, 151:153-7.

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部