再论清华简《筮法》与数字卦诸问题

More Discussion of Several Questions about Shifa on Tsinghua Bamboo Slips and Digital Hexagrams

清华简《筮法》能够给数字卦问题的讨论提供可靠的资料和进一步深入的契机。数字卦不是卦象符号的起源,清华简《筮法》篇能够给这一论断提供十分有力的支持。清华简《筮法》揭示了筮法问题的复杂,不仅对成卦方法研究需要考虑到各种可能,而且对解卦方法的研究也要考虑其多样性。在总体上,清华简《筮法》占筮系统与《周易》占筮系统有着很大的理论差距,前者应该不属于三《易》系统而属于民间杂占一类。特别是就一种民间流行的占筮系统而言,清华简《筮法》与《左传》《国语》中《周易》解说22例所反映的官方易占系统差异明显。

Digital Hexagrams are not original of six-digit hexagrams. This conclusion can be strongly supported by Shifa on Tsinghua Bamboo Slips. This conclusion is the basis and premise of the study of Shifa on Tsinghua Bamboo Slips. Because there is no discussion about Hexagrams-forming methods in Shifa on Tsinghua Bamboo Slips, the discussion of divining methods should be with the help of Digital Hexagrams and every possibility of Trigram-Change. The complexity of Hexagrams-interpreting methods of Shifa on Tsinghua Bamboo Slips could be ascribed to blend thoughts and inherent intention in the Warring States time, may well lead to the deficiency of theory study and the random usage of divining methods.