摘要
本文采用干预效应模型和倾向值加权模型,在控制了就业类别的选择偏差基础上,分析了正规就业的流动人口与非正规就业的流动人口在社会融合方面的差异。结果表明,流动人口中的正规就业者和非正规就业者,在受教育水平、工作经验、职业和工作获得方式等方面存在显著差别。在控制选择偏差以后,非正规就业的流动人口的社会融合水平显著低于正规就业的流动人口。剥离户籍对就业机会、就业身份和就业保障的影响,是户籍改革的应有之义。
This paper uses the treatment effect model and propensity score weighting model,by controlling the selection bias,and analyzes the social integration differentials between formal employment and informal employment of floating population.The results show that the education,work experience,occupation and other chracteristics are significantlly different between the two groups.After controlling the selection biases,there are statistically significant differences of social integration between the two groups.To eliminate the influence of household registration on employment opportunities and employment security is the proper meaning of the household registration reform.
出处
《中南财经政法大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期30-35,159,共6页
Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
基金
北京市社会科学基金研究基地项目"北京市流动人口非正规就业状况研究"(14JDSHB006)
关键词
非正规就业
流动人口
社会融合
干预效应模型
Imformal Employment
Social Integration
Treatment Effect Model
Propensity Score Weighting Model
Floating Population