期刊文献+

71例瘢痕子宫阴道试产的母儿结局分析 被引量:16

Clinical analysis on maternal and neonatal outcomes for 71 pregnant women with scarred uterus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨瘢痕子宫足月妊娠后阴道试产成功与否的临床综合指标。方法 2015年1月至2016年5月对核工业四一六医院无阴道分娩禁忌证的71例瘢痕子宫孕妇足月妊娠后选择剖宫产术后阴道试产(TOLAC),按分娩结果分成TOLAC成功组和TOLAC失败组,综合分析试产成功组与失败组母儿临床资料及相关风险因素。结果 71例瘢痕子宫孕妇足月妊娠后51例阴道分娩成功(成功组),20例阴道试产失败(失败组)。2组在围产期并发症、宫颈成熟度、产后出血量、自主哺乳时间、新生儿体质量比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),新生儿并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论瘢痕子宫再次妊娠足月的孕妇,在宫颈Bishop评分大于5分、无孕期并发症和自然临产条件下,阴道试产成功率高、恢复快,对阴道试产失败者及时重复剖宫产,妊娠结局仍然良好。 Objective To evaluate the comprehensive indexes of the outcome of vaginal delivery in full-term pregnancy with caesarean scar. Methods Full-term pregnant women without any contraindications of vaginal delivery in 416 Hospital of China National Nuclear Corpo- ration from January 2015 to May 2016 were enrolled in the study. According to the delivery outcomes, the pregnant women with cesarean scars were divivded into successful group and failed group. The clinical data and relevent risk factors of maternal and fetal outcomes in two groups were analyzed comprehensively. Results Fifty-one cases have succeeded 71 pregnant women ,20 cases failed. There were significantly differ- ences in perinatal complications, cervical ripening, the amount of postpartum bleeding, the time of colostrums spontaneous secretion and breastfeeding, neonatal weight between the two groups( P 〈 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in the incidence of neonatal complica- tions between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Full-term pregnant women with caesarean scar had a higher success rate of vaginal delivery under conditions of Bishop score 〉 5, without pregnancy complication, which recoverd quickly with short hospitalization time. Failed vaginal delivery group applied repeated cesarean section, then resulted in favorable pregnancy outcomes.
出处 《局解手术学杂志》 2016年第12期875-878,共4页 Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
基金 成都市卫计委基金-剖宫产后再次妊娠阴道分娩的可行性研究(2015150)
关键词 瘢痕子宫 足月妊娠 阴道试产 分娩结局 影响因素 scarred uterus full-term pregnancy trial of labor pregnancy outcome affecting factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献51

  • 1杨洪波,李晶,陈杜平,狄锋宇.剖宫产后再次妊娠的分娩方式探讨[J].实用妇产科杂志,2004,20(5):273-274. 被引量:111
  • 2张小勤.剖宫产术后再次妊娠177例分娩方式分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(1):57-58. 被引量:262
  • 3李芳,刘小英.疤痕子宫再次妊娠126例回顾性分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(6):809-810. 被引量:31
  • 4傅才英,吴佩煜,翁霞云主编.妇产科手术学[M].第2版,北京:人民军医出版社,2003:320.
  • 5American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal birthafter previous cesarean[ J]. Obstet Gynecol,2004,104 :203-204.
  • 6Galyean AM,Lagrew DC,Bush MC,et al. Previous cesarean sectionand the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neo-natal outcomes in future pregnancies[ J]. J Perinatol,2009,29( 11):726-730.
  • 7Olusanya BO, Solanke OA. Adverse neonatal outcomes associatedwith trial of labor after previous cesarean deliveryin an inner-city hos-pital in lagos,Nigeria[ J], Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2009,107 (2):135-139.
  • 8Makino S,Tanaka T,Itoh S,et al. Prospective comparison of deliveryoutcomes of vaginal birth after cesarean section versus laparoscopicmyomectomy[ J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2008,34(6) :952-956.
  • 9Guise JM,Mcdonagh MS,Osterweil P,et al. Systematic review of theincidence and consequences of uterine rupturein women with previouscaesarean section[ J]. BMJ,2004,329( 1) :19-25.
  • 10Eugene D, Fay M, Marian MD. Maternal risk profiles and the primary ce- sarean rate in the untie states, 1991 ~ 2002. Am J Public Health, 2006, 96:867.

共引文献91

同被引文献119

引证文献16

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部